Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 12
Author(s): Sten Konow
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 282
________________ No. 28.] KUDIMIYAMALAI INSCRIPTION ON MUSIC. 231 euch discrepancios existed, as can be seen from certain quotations from that author which bave come down to us. But on the whole the inscription agrees more with the Naradi-fiksha than with the S. R., which must be explained, I think, by the former work representing an earlier period of music. Further, the author of the S. R. consulted works on musio from various parts of the country (see below), before writing about the music of an older period than his own, and he made a selection of definitions-on what principle we do not know. The music in the inscription, on the other hand, must have been current at the time of its composition in the district in which the inscription is found. We have seen that this music is in much better agreement with the Näradi-fiksha than with the 8. R., which was influenced by musical treatises of different parts of the country (see the introductory Elokas and frequent references to the Southern Indian music in the 8. R.). Mr. Chinnuswami Mudaliar in his Oriental Musio says that the Southern Indian Music is founded on the teachings of Nárada, whereas that of Northern India rests on the basis of Hanumat's teachings. Mr. Madaliar gives no authority for his statement; perhaps it is a tradition. If so, the better agreement of the inscription with the Nāradi-fiksha, which we have noticed, would seem to lend colour to it, though a similar comparison with the treatise of Hanumat (which is no longer extant) is necessary before one can make a definite statement. Of course, this refers to olden times. The more modern Indian music from the 16th century onwards bas been greatly influenced by the music of the Arabs, in all parts of the country. This treatise, according to the colophon, was composed by some king, who was the pupil of Rudrāchärya. It is impossible to say whether this Rudracharya be the same as Budrata mentioned by Matanga (vide 8. R., p. 82). SECTION I. सिक्षम् ।' नमः (0) शिवाय) । मध्यमग्राम चतुषाहारस्वरागमाः 1 संनेपुंस गिनेगिस नेधुनेस मुनेस मिरगिस कंगेनुसं सगिनेस नेमुंपसुं मिगनेस मुंनेस रमिगसे धुनेगिस पिमपिसे गधुनेस मुंनेपुल १ नरंगे मिगरेग नेसरमि सगिनेमुं मुंरगि [मुं]पैरंगें गिसरगि सनरगि रुंगेनगें पिगरेम नेपुरगि गरेमिग पिनेरगि सेरमिम । 3 पुंस[मुं] गिसने नेसमेपुं मनिमपि धुन] मुं निमनिय रेगम 'धुमन] मिधुन सधुन नेसमुं सगिने नेधुने गिसमुंफे। Of course, this is to be understood to mean that the two authors have recorded the music of their rouprotiv provinces. * The akaharaj and the vertical stroke after it are entered below the line. The heading me all written t be left-hand margin. y seems to be corrected from it. • Originally 7 ww engraved in place of it. नेपुंनेस धुनेरयि। मुंगेरंगें संमुंने गुंपैमुं

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464