Book Title: Kalpasutra
Author(s): Hermann Jacobi
Publisher: Leipzig

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 28
________________ Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra www.kobatirth.org Acharya Shri Kailassagarsuri Gyanmandir Introduction. 15 are said to have proceeded from the mouth of Mahâvîra. This statement is not to be understood as if Mahâvîra had actually composed the añgas, upangas, etc.; but as they record what had been taught by him, he is regarded as their author. For authorship in India depended chiefly on the matter, the words being rather irrelevant, provided the sense be the same. That Mahâvîra was not the author of the Sûtras in our sense of "author", can easily be proved by those works themselves. For many Sûtı commerce by relating that they were declared to Jambu by Sudharman. Most probably, the doctrines and words of Mahâvîra were, originally, not arranged into distinct works. But at Bhadrabâhu's time the eleven angas existed already, for he explained them in separate works of his own; compare also the legend of Bhadrabâhu and Sthûlabhadra related above, where it is said that the sangha of Pâţaliputra had collected the eleven angas. Since that time the Sûtras must have undergone many alterations. That can be proved by the Sthânângasútra, which classes under sthâna 7 the seven nihnavas or schisms. They are also mentioned together with some details in the Avaçyakasútra. As the seventh nihnaya happened in 584 A.V., it follows that even in the sixth or seventh century after Mahâvîra the Sûtras were liable to material additions ?). · The ultimate redaction of the Jaina books was, according to the common and old tradition (see notes to K. S. § 148), made 980 A.V. by Devarddhiganin Kshamâçramaņa 2). The date 980 A.V. corresponds with 454 of our Era, on the supposition that at that time the Nirvâna was placed 470 before Vikrama. But if at that time the older tradition by means of which we have adjusted the date of the Nirvâņa, was still in use, the corresponding year of our Era would be 514 A.D. Jinaprabhamuni and Padmamandiraganin relate that when Devarddhiganin saw the Siddhânta i. e. 45 Ägamas on the verge of dying out, he caused it to be written in books by the sangha of Valabhî. Formerly, they say, teachers instructed their pupils pustakanapekshayâ, without having recourse to written books; but afterwards they used books, and so they do now when delivering their lessons in the upâçrayas. This vriddhasampradâya does not imply that Devarddhiganin was the first who reduced the sacred lore of the Jainas to writing, but it states only that ancient teachers relied 1) More modern works, such as the Tikå of the Uttaradhyayana, add to these alpataravisumvadinah nilinavůh another bahutaravisamvadi nihnavak, that of the Diganbaras 605 AV. The Digammras say that the "Cvetâmbara utpatti" happened under Guptigupta, who was Thera samvat 36-46. 2) With this record agrees very well the fact that the Thorâvals of the Kalpasâtra and of the Rishimandalasûtra name as the last Thera Devarddhiganin, and the Therâvals of the Avaçyaka and Nandi Sûtras carry the list of the Theras down to him, but name him not; he is, therefore, supposed to have placed the Therâvali at the head of the Nandi and Avaçyaka Sûtras. For Private and Personal Use Only

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191