Book Title: Vivek Chudamani Author(s): Chandrashekhar Bharti Swami, P Sankaranarayan Publisher: Bharatiya VidyabhavanPage 33
________________ xxix and cautions the śisya against harbouring anātma-vāsanās in his mind and getting into their grip. These vāsanās, he mentions, are difficult to overcome because of their strength acquired in a number of previous lives. They can be liquidated only by persistent and continuous culture of the ātmavāsanā. This cannot be done during the span of a single life. That is why, the Bhagavan said in the Gītā, "bahūnām janmanām ante jñānavān mām prapadyate": Many births are necessary for the anātma-vāsanās to wear away. If great personages have become jivanmuktas in their present lives, it only means that during their past lives up to the present their anātmavāsanās have been gradually diminishing to the extent of complete extinction. INTRODUCTION VIII Readers of Vivekacuḍāmaņi will notice that there is practically no mention in it of the worship of a personal God. Advaita Vedānta affirms two Brahmans, nirguna and saguna Brahmans. The ultimate metaphysical truth is the nirguna Brahman. That is declared in a number of passages in the Upanisads. This nirguņa Brahman is from one point of view transcendental (pāramārthika), because it has not in it any of the features of the empirical (vyāvahārika) world. From another point of view, it is immanent, because all that constitutes the empirical world is only an appearance of the nirguna Brahman, which is its substratum. The prapañca is āropita on Brahman; which is its adhisthāna and, as such, the whole world is only Brahman appearing variegated in name and form. When nirguna Brahman is conceived as saguna, with the power to start the cosmic process with the aid of māyā, it is known as Iśvara, who, in essence, is not different from the nirguna Brahman. sarvam khalu idam Brahma and ayam ātmā Brahma only express in philosophical language the religious truth of the immanence of God in all things and all men and which bids us see and act towards them, not as they appear as discrete entities, but in terms of the divinity imbedded in them of which they are the visible expressions. Therefore, the difference between the two Brahmans is only in the manner of conception and approach, whether it is by way of jñāna to understand and realise the Supreme Principle of the universe, or by way of bhakti towards the same Principle considered as a Person responsible for the creation etc., of the world. The main purpose of the Vivekacūḍāmaņi is to describe the intellectual approach by analysis of the inner self and equating it withPage Navigation
1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 ... 552