Book Title: Swayambhustotra
Author(s): Vijay K Jain
Publisher: Vikalp

Previous | Next

Page 101
________________ Svayambhūstotra O Lord Śreyānsanātha! The conflict between the two contradictory points of view is resolved by illustration (dystānta)* The absolutistic point of view, however, is not amenable to such illustration**. Only your doctrine of manifold points of view or non-absolutism (anekāntavāda)*** is able to establish the reality of substances. *Illustration (drstānta) helps to prove a thing through universal concomitance (vyāpti), which is a kind of relationship between the major term (sādhya) and the middle term (hetu or sādhana). For example, we infer fire (which is the major term or sādhya) from smoke (which is the middle term or hetu) through the relationship of universal concomitance, viz., “where there is fire, there is smoke”. **In trying to establish absolutism through illustration, we must accept a major term (sādhya) and a middle term (hetu or sādhana). This contradicts the view that there is nothing but one (advaitavāda). The use of the major term and the middle term in order to reason out and establish advaitavāda must bring in duality, the very opposite of the doctrine of absolutism. ***The appreciation of multiple attributes in a single substance is the bedrock of anekāntavāda in Jaina philosophy. 76

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246