Book Title: Sramana 2016 04
Author(s): Shreeprakash Pandey, Rahulkumar Singh, Omprakash Singh
Publisher: Parshvanath Vidhyashram Varanasi

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 62
________________ Reconsidering the Date of the Nirvāṇa of Lord Mahāvira : 55 If we accept the date of the Vira Nirvāṇa as 467 B.C., then the period of his Yuga Pradhānaship extends between 154 and 223 A.D. According to the inscriptions he had a disciple in 132 A.D. yet one can be contented by assuming that he must have initiated someone 22 years before being a Yuga Pradhāna. If we accept his life-span to be 100 years, he must have been 11 years old when he is supposed to have initiated Māghahasti. It seems almost impossible to believe that he was able to initiate somebody by his sermons at the age of 11 and that such an underage disciple was able to perform the MūrtiPratişthā. But if, on the basis of the traditional concept, we accept the Vira Nirvāņa year to be before 605 of the Saka Era or 52 B.C., then the references made in the Patļāvalīs tally with the inscriptional evidences. On this basis his tenure of Yuga Pradhānaship extends from 16 to 85 of the Saka Era, Māghahasti, one of his disciples was able to perform the Mürti-Pratisthā by his sermons. Although common sense would hardly accept it as logical that his Yuga Pradhānaship extended for 69 years, yet because of the fact that it considers the information given in the Pattāvalīs to be correct, this inscriptional evidence about Nāgahasti supports the date of Vira Nirvāņa as 527 B.C. Again, in one of the inscriptional sketches of Mathura, Ārya Krşņa with that Arya Krsna mentioned after Sivabhūti in Kalpasūtra Sthavirāvali (last part 4:1), then his period on the basis of the Pattāvalis and Viseșāvasyakabhäşya,23 could be established around 609. V.N.S., because as a result of the dispute over clothes between the same Ārya Krsna and Sivabhūti the Botika, Nihnava came into extistence. The period of this dispute is fixed as 609 V.N.S. If we accept the Vīra Nirvāņa year to be 467, then the period of Arya Krsna is supposed to be as 609-467=142 A.D. This inscriptional sketch belongs to 95+78=173 A.D. Since Ārya Krşņa has been figured as a deity, it is natural that 20-25 years after his death, in 173 A.D., this sketch must have been made by some Arya Arha, one of his follower disciples. In this way, this inscriptional evidence can maintain compatibility with other literary reference only when 467

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186