Book Title: Sambodhi 1979 Vol 08
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 104
________________ 'EXISTS' AND 'PREDICATE' J. L. Shaw The aim of this article is to show that the question whether 'exists' is a predicate cannot be answered unless we determine the meaning of the terms 'predicate' and 'exists'. Moreovere, we have to specify the meaning of certain other terms like 'subject', 'real', 'property', 'universal' etc. if we want to discuss this question satisfactorily. But most of the philosophers who have discussed this question did not specify the meaning of these terms clearly. As a result, the supporters of each view claimed to refute the view of their opponents when in fact these views are mutually compatible. I would like to show that in some sense 'exists' is a predicate and in some other sence "exists' is not a predicate. Before developing my positive thesis I would like to discuss the prevalent views on this topic. A. Arguments against 'exists' being a predicate : 1. If 'exists' is a predicate. then the ascription of existence or the denial of it would make some difference to the subject. Since neither the ascription nor the denial of existence makes any difference to the subject, 'exists' is not a predicate. This type of argument is present in Kant. This argument is based on a particular view of predicate. 2. If 'exists' is a predicate, then existence must be a what i.e. a quality of Reality. Since existence cannot be a what i.e. a quality of Reality, 'exists' is not a predicate. This type of argument has been put forward by some idealist philosophers. This argument is based on a certain conception of Reality and predicate. 3. Ayer, Wisdom and Broad have argued that if 'exists' is a predicato, then all positive existential propositions are analytic and all negative ones are self-contradictory. Since all positive existential propositions are not analytic and all negative ones are not self-contradictory, 'exists' is not a predicate. This argument is based on a particular condition of attribution. According to the view criticized when we ascribe an atribute to a thing, we covertly assert that it exists. 4. If 'exists' is a predicate, then we can assert universal affirmative existential propositions and particular negative existential propositions. Since Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392