Book Title: Indian Logic Part 03
Author(s): Nagin J Shah
Publisher: Sanskrit Sanskriti Granthmala

Previous | Next

Page 27
________________ 16 INDIAN LOGIC the one hand and six Vedāngas, Nyāya and Mīmāṁsā or the other; Jayanta emphasises that the first six vidyāsthānas are of theological use in a direct fashion, the remaining eight in an indirect fashion.? Jayanta next takes up the question of the remaining non-Vedic scriptural texts which he divides into a pro-Vedic group and an anti-Vedic group. The former includes the scriptural texts current with the Purāņist subsects like Saiva, Pancarātra etc., the latter those current with the anti-Vedic sects like Buddhist, Jain etc.13 Taking up the former group first Jayanta says that the texts included here are all authentic, though not as authentic as the texts of Manu etc.14 The reservation thus made is noteworthy. For the deities like Siva, Visnu etc. which were the presiding deities of sects like Saiva, Pancarātra etc. were so obviously Purāņic deities, and so these sects were so obviously sub-sects among the Purāņists. Hence when Jayanta says that the scriptural texts belonging to these sub-sects are not as authentic as the texts of Manu etc. he can only mean that Dharmasastras and Purāņas are acceptable to all Purāņists without exception while these texts are acceptable only to this or that sub-sect among the Purāņists. However, in terms of his own mode of argumentation Jayanta should somehow show that these texts are composed by somebody less authoritative than Manu etc.; but curiously, on this point Jayanta rather says that both the received tradition and inference go to establish that these texts are a composition by God.'s Really, one crucial thing said by Jayanta about these texts applies to Purānas as such; thus we are told these texts, while not contradicting Vedas, recommend certain rituals of their own.'16 For the Puranic ritual was obviously so much different from the Vedic ritual while the ritual practised by the Saivas etc. was only a variety of Purānic ritual. Jayanta discreetly kept silent about the Purānic ritual as such because that was practised by the Purānist camp as a whole; but he could say about the sub-sects like Saiva etc. that they practised a ritual of their own. Even so, Jayanta should have explained how God could compose texts that were less authentic than those of Manu etc. About Pañcarātra scriptural texts Jayanta says that they themselves declare themselves to be a composition by Vişnu while Vişnu is but God Himself;"7 from this we can well surmise that about the scriptural texts of Saivas etc. too Jayanta will say that they themselves declare themselves to be a composition by Siva etc. while Siva etc. are but God. He actually

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226