Book Title: Indian Logic Part 03 Author(s): Nagin J Shah Publisher: Sanskrit Sanskriti GranthmalaPage 64
________________ 53 PROBLEMS OF UNIVERSALS,... Kumārilite appears on the scene with his following submission : "All this is very much confusing but there is a way out. As for the person concerned it is very much doubtful whether any part of the verb concerned - the root or the suffix - denotes him at all, and so there is no question of his constituting sentential meaning. 6 As for the result concerned, it as something already brought about is not mentioned by a sentence, its mention being as something to be brought about; so it too cannot constitute sentential meaning." But if the result concerned is thus mentioned as something to be brought about then sentential meaning ought to be the operation aimed at bringing about this result."'18 Thus is introduced the Kumärilite thesis that the operation aimed at bringing about the result concerned, an operation technically called 'bhāvanā' (='causing', 'bringing into existence'), is what constitutes sentential meaning; in what follows this thesis is elaborated in details. The Kumārilite begins by submitting that all sentence on account of the inevitable presence of a verb there involves reference to an operation undertaken by the agent concerned with a view to bringing about a result, and since 'an operation undertaken with a view to bringing about a result is what he understands by 'bhāvanā,' this submission amounts to saying that all sentence involves reference to a 'bhāvanā'.19 In this connection what is chiefly had in mind are the Vedic injunctive sentences pertaining to yajña-performance, but the submission in question is obviously of a general significance as is explicitly made clear by emphasising that even ordinary verbs in indicative mood like 'cooks', 'reads', 'goes' etc. refer to a 'bhāvanā'; thus, for example, 'cooks' means 'undertakes an operation with a view to bringing about the result called "cooking":20 Now a verb is composed of a root-part and a suffix-part, and it is first maintained that 'bhāvanā' is denoted by the suffix-part.21 But later on it is conceded that there is no harm even in supposing that 'bhāvanā' is denoted by the root-part, the essential point being that a verb as a whole somehow involves reference to a 'bhāvanā. °22 Then it is contended that all bhāvanā necessarily requires three factors in the form of an objective, an instrument and a manner of doing.23 The simple point is that about all performance there have to be answered • the following three questions : 2 (1) What is the result to be achieved ? (2) What is the instrument to be employed ?Page Navigation
1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226