Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 28 Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 74
________________ 60 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY. [MARCH, 1899. maintained. There remain thus for our guidance only the facts of the actual topography of Buner and that knowledge of its extant ruins which the tour described in this report has furnished. Reviewing then the most prominent of the ancient sites surveyed we can scarcely fail to note the remarkable agreement which the ruins of Pinjkōtai (Sanigram), Gumbatai (Tursak) and Girārai present with the three sacred spots specified in the Chinese accounts, both as regards their character and their relative position. We start from Manglaur as our fixed point. Referring to the latest survey we find that Sunigram lies almost due south of it, exactly in the position indicated for the Mahāvana monastery. The nearest route between the two places lies over the Khalil Pass (west of Dosirri) and then via Gokand down to Padshah and Elai. It measures on the map about 26 miles, which distance converted according to the value previously indicated corresponds to about 156 l. If on the basis of the explanations already given, we add to this distance on the map one-fourth in order to obtain the approximate road measurement, we arrive at the result of 192 li. This agrees as closely as we can reasonably expect with the 200 of Hinen Tsiang's estimate. The pilgrim's description of the Mahavana monastery as situated "by the side of a great mountain" is fully applicable to the Pinjkōtai ruins. Even the absence of any reference to a Stupa in connection with this monastery acquires significance in view of the fact that among the ruins, as described above, we fail to trace the remains of a Stupa of any size. Mo-su Gumbatai. The next stage of Hiuen Tsiang's itinerary to the Mo-su monastery takes us down the mountain to the north-west of the Mahavana Sanghārāma for a distance of 30 or 40 li. Here the correspondence is again most striking. It is exactly to the north-west of the Pinjkōtai ruins, and after descending from the steep hill side on which they are situated, that we reach the Gumbatai site near Tursak. Its actual distance by road is about 6 miles, which corresponds to 36 li, or the mean of the approximate figures given by the pilgrim. Here we have no difficulty in recognizing the high Stupa mentioned both by Hiuen Tsiang and Sung-Yun in the still extant mound, which even in its ruined condition forms a striking feature of the site. It can scarcely surprise us that the rapid survey of the ruins failed to bring to light here the stone at the foot of the Stupa which according to the pious tradition marked the spot where Buddha had broken a bone of his body to write sacred texts with his marrow. The description of the site given above shows to what depth the base of the Stupa is now hidden under débris. Girarai: Stupa of 'Dove-ransoming.' Going 60 or 70 li to the west of the Mo-su Vihara, Hiuen Tsiang had visited the Stupa reared over the spot where Buddha, according to the pious legend noticed also by Fa-Hien, had sacrificed his body to ransom the dove. The bearing and distance here indicated agree so accurately with those of the rained mounds near Girarai relative to Gumbatai that I do not hesitate to propose the identification of the former with the sacred site referred to by the two pilgrims. The ruined Stūpas of Ali Khan Kōtē lie as above indicated, about 1 miles to the west of Girarai village. The distance from the latter place to Tursak on the direct track I marched by, was estimated by me at the time at about 7 miles. The Gumbatai site again is, as already stated (p. 25) 1 miles distant from Tursak. The total of these measurements is 10 miles, which represents exactly the 60 li of Hiuen Tsiang's estimate. There is the same accurate agreement as regards the direction, the map and my own notes showing Girarai to be situated almost exactly due west of Tursak. Route to Gandhara. There are two observations contained in the accounts of the Chinese pilgrims which enable us to test at this point our chain of identifications. Fa-Hien's narrative (see above, p. 46) tells us that the travellers going downwards from the spot where Buddha ransomed the dove, towards the east, in five days came to the country of Gandhara. From the remarks which follow, it can be concluded with great probability that the road disauce here given by Fa-Hien was measured to the spot "where Buddha in a former birth hadPage Navigation
1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356