Book Title: Studies in Jainism Author(s): M P Marathe, Meena A Kelkar, P P Gokhle Publisher: Indian Philosophical Quarterly Publication PunaPage 79
________________ 64 STUDIES IN JAINISM might urge that as there is no substance--not even Time substancein alokā kāśa, alokākāśa should not undergo changes and consequently should not be regarded as a real. The Jainas contened that lokākāśa and alokākasa being not two akākāśa individuals, the effect of time is present throughout the one ākāśa. Again, they maintain that entire ākāśa undergoes changes through the rhythemic rise and fall in its agurulaghuguna (literally : neither-heavey-norlight-quality)30 SECTION II : TIME 1. Introductory In the < ldest times, we find the idea of Time as the highest principle and power governing all things. In the Atharvaveda we come across a hymn which extols time as the basis of all things; it creates all things and it destroys all things. This idea of Time further asserted itself. We find discussed in philosophical works the doctrine of time (kālavāda) which traces all things back to Time. In the mouth of the upholder of this doctrine the following words are put : “ Time brings all creatures to ripeness, Time again destroys all things. Time keeps awake among the sleepy. It is hard to transgress Time. Without Time not even a bean is cooked, even when a man has placed the pot in Fire; therefore a man knows that it has occured through Time.2" Time creates all things, Time ripens all things and Time destroys all things. Time is all-powerfull. But in the days of philosophical systems the doctrine of Time (kālavāda) remains in the background and Time loses its importance as the prime ground of all things. Some philosophical systems altogether rejected Time and others that accepted it recognized it not as the prime ground of all things but merely as a condition of their temporal aspect. We need not enter into the exposition of the various conceptions of Time, found in different philosophical systems. 2. Time and Jaina Āgamic Works In the Āvaśyaka Cūrņi, three different views on the nature of time are referred to. Some say that time is a quality3; some maintain that is it nothing but modes of substancest; still some others opine that it is an independent substance (dravya) in additionPage Navigation
1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284