Book Title: Studies in Jainism
Author(s): M P Marathe, Meena A Kelkar, P P Gokhle
Publisher: Indian Philosophical Quarterly Publication Puna

Previous | Next

Page 159
________________ 144 in this essay. The point, however, is made to avert the possible confusions of mixing between them. STUDIES IN JAINISM The expression Saptabhangi or syadvada literally means a set of seven formulae. Each one of such formulae is prefixed by of the expression 'syat'. It is on account of this that the doctrine Saptabhangi is also known as Syadvada. The expression Syat', as mentioned in the beginning of the paper, is rendered and understood in a particular way i.e. in the sense of a modal predicate or modal notion. It is this phenomenon that causes a considerable strain in understanding it as clearly as possible. However it may be. One point, nevertheless, is clear viz. that the expression Saptbhängi is understood as a set of seven formulae each one of which is prefixed by the expression "Syat'.2 It is clearly ackowledged that the expression 'syat can indeed be used in various senses. Yet out of the plurality of all these different senses only two are mainly to be prominently highlighted in the context of Syadvada. The one of them, in the sense of a grammatical particle (avyaya) is so very clearly mentioned by many authors. The other, on the contrary, in the sense of a potential (lin), however, is left understood by some texts. This sense is clear, however, not only from dictionaries but also from reliable Jaina philosophical texts. This second sense, though, has an important consideration about it as will become clear in the sequel. It is argued that although the word or expression 'syat' is understood in the sense of anekānta, vidhi vicāra etc., yet in the context under consideration, that is, fixation of the significance of the expression in the context of Saptabhangi, it is, nevertheless, to be understood in the sense of anekanta.5 Anekanta means that a given object or thing is (potentially) beset with many dharmas. The grammatical particle (avayaya) syat is indicative (dyotaka) of this. Syadvada as a doctrine arises from this consideration. Syadvāda, thus, essentially is that hypothesis (abhyupagama) in accordance with which it happens to be maintained that (any) one thing is (potentially) beset with many dharmas, invariable or variable (nityānitya). Understood in this way, Syadväda is that frame in terms of which we are in a position to explain and justify our contention that as a matter of fact different dharmas can be predicated of a given thing.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284