Book Title: Studies in Jainism
Author(s): M P Marathe, Meena A Kelkar, P P Gokhle
Publisher: Indian Philosophical Quarterly Publication Puna

Previous | Next

Page 175
________________ 160 suppose a statement P has the truth-vaiue I. Now the negation of P is also I. The conjunction of P and ~ P is again I and the disjunction P and P, i. e. P V ~P is also I. Thus the first four statements of Naya Saptabbangi are respectively P, P, PV~P and PA P and each one of them has the truth-value I. The fifth statement is the conjunction of the first and the fourth statements, the sixth statement is the conjunction of the fourth statement and the second statement and lastly the seventh statement is the conjuction of the fourth statement and the third statement. In this way, obviously according to the rule of conjunction the truth-value of all these three compound statements is I. So the table of seven nayas is like this; 1. P where P is I 2. ~P which is I 3. PV 4. PA 5. P) which is 1 6. PA (PAP) which is I 7. (PV~P) A (PAP) which is I This table becomes logically verified if we maintain that the logic of Nayas is a three-valued logic of Lukasiewicz. Surprisingly enough, the Naya Saptabhangi challenges the law of Excluded Middle, because here PVP which is the classical formulation of the law is not a tautology as its truth-value is I and not T. It further challenges the law of contradiction because here PA P which is the classical formulation of the law is not false but I. It assumes that the truth-value of a conjunction it the falsest, and that of a disjunction is the truest, of the truth-values of its components. Now these epoch-making discoveries of Jaina logicians can be understood in their proper perspectives and further they can be logically, though not historically, linked with the modern developments of three-valued logic. ~ ~ P which is 1 P which is I ~ STUDIES IN JAINISM PA (PA~ 2 ~ Now it may be asked here as to how and why we should suppose that Jaina logicians knew such important truth-functional connectives or operators as negation, disjunction and conjunction of Lukasiewiczian Three-valued logic. To this we may reply that at first it should be noted that logicians like Vidyananda and Anantavirya have clearly described these operators and secondly it is to be conceded that they have also a clear concept of the

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284