________________
Paninian Sutras of the Type अन्येभ्योऽपि दृश्यते
99
The difference between 3. 2. 1 and 3. 2. 75, then, is that fit and so on, used after verbs construed with upapadas, did indeed have a restricted specifiable domain at one stage of the language and were being generalized, so that one has to observe the usage of model speakers to determine grammatically appropriate usage.
2.7. 31319 30162) EC14 (ACH [3.2.123] H 1414 (3.2.85]) 1 31 31 3 asfo दृश्यन्ते । ३।३।३ भविष्यति गम्यादयः ।
2.7.1. 3.3.1 states that the affixes of the set beginning with 34 occur variously (46474) when an action signified by verbal bases to which they are introduced is referred to current time (acne). For example : ons 'artisan', ary 'wind', 4r 'anus', gry 'medicinal herb, physician', hry 'bile', tang 'sweet', Hn 'noble person, sādhu', 3771 'fact23. 3.3.2 then provides that the same affixes also are seen to occur when an action is referred to the past. For example, Art vartman 'path' refers to something that has been gone on (974)24. Further, 3.3.3 states that the derivates 1147 and so on refer to the future : 74 'one who will go, a traveller', 3T one who will come', प्रस्थायिन् 'one who will depart', प्रतिरोधिन् 'one who will oppose', प्रतिबोधिन् 'one who will awaken', ufunt 'one who will oppose', Alfr 'one that will be contrary to', uffit 'one who will come back”, 314Ifti 'one who will come', fa7 'which will be 25)
2.7.2. A ślokavārttika on 3.3.1 gives reasons why Pāņini formulates this sūtra with 25614 instead of simply saying 30144:, thereby providing that derivates with the affixes of the set beginning with 34 are acceptable correct usage. The property of applying variously (alem H) is taken into account because the affixes 34 and so on appear, in derivations actually provided for, after a small number of the possible bases, not all the bases after which such affixes could occur, and because only most of the actually possible affixes are actually introduced in derivations provided, not all of the possible affixes. In addition, there is a residue of operations that is not taken care of in the derivations as actually provided26. The Kāśikā captures the major emphasis of this by noting that the affixes in question appear also with bases other than those after which they are explicitly provided for and some, though they are not explicitly provided for, are inferred from usage27.
2.7.3. In 3.3.2, Pāṇini uses Eged, and the Kāśikā remarks that this is meant in order that one follow usage in determining which particular
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
