Book Title: Jambu Jyoti
Author(s): M A Dhaky, Jitendra B Shah
Publisher: Kasturbhai Lalbhai Smarak Nidhi Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 172
________________ The Date of Kasāyapāhuda 161 that the language of KP is highly influenced by the Mahārāstrī Prakrit in this respect. (iv) The verbal root vbhū is employed as bhav-, hav- and ho- at the rate of 9, 61 and 30 percent in the PS while in the KP their rate is 5, 2.5, and 92.5 percent respectively. The Prakrit form ho- is rather a later development whereas bhav- and hav- belong to the earlier strata of the MIA. dialects. (v) The number of absolutive participles in the KP is not so numerous as to compare their variety for deciding the time of its composition but it is evident that the PS employs older affixes (Sanskrit and Sanskritlike) in greater number whereas the KP uses purely Prakrit affixes like -dūna and -tūnam. This trait proves that the date of KP is later than that of the PS. (vi) The affix of the future tense is -ssa- in the PS whereas -hi- in the KP and this goes against its being an earlier work than the PS. Thus, the study of the linguistic data proves that the Kasāyapāhuda is a work composed later than the Pavayanapāhuda. In this context it is not convincing to accept the opinion of those scholars who assign it a date earlier than that to the Pravacanasāra of Kundakunda. Annotations : PS = Pavayanasāra or Pavayanapāhuda, KP = Kasāyapāhuda 1. Date of Kundakundācārya A. According to A. N. Upadhye, "the age of Kundakunda should be limited in the light of the circumstantial evidences noted above to the first two centuries of the Christian era." He further notes “I am inclined to believe, after this long survey of the available material, that Kundakunda's age lies at the beginning of the Christian era." See his Pravacanasāra, "Introduction", Agasa 1964, p. 21. B. N. C. Shastri is of the same opinion as given by A. N. Upadhye : See his प्राकृत भाषा और साहित्य का आलोचनात्मक इतिहास, वाराणसी १९६६, पृ० २२५. C. J. C. Jain is of the opinion that Ācārya Kundakunda seems to have flourished in the third or fourth century A. D. Vide miçan mifere cat sfer, armurt 88€8, Ļo p90. D. H. L. Jain thinks it worthwhile to place Kundakunda in the beginning of the fifth century A. D. or a little earlier than that : See his rite Fitofa er at योगदान, भोपाल १९६२, पृ०८३. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448