Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 37
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 50
________________ 44 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY. [FEBRUARY, 1908. conquered the provinces between Mathura and Benares, as the co-existence of the coins of HimaKadphisa with those of Kaniska is not a conclusive proof of the conquest of the whole tract in which these coins are found by the former. Then again Yuan-Chuang or Hiuen Thsang has related that Kaniska conquered Kashgar, Yarkand, and Khotan. Though it is very hard to rely on this statement, it will be seen later on that fresh discoveries confirm them. In conclusion I may be allowed to state that Kanişka might have founded a new era. Mr. Bhāndārkar then assumes that the Kusāna king referred to in the Panjtar inscription is Kozoulo Kad phises. Mr. V. A. Smith has also supported this identification. The terms Maharaya and Mahārāja are convertible terms in Prakrit, and the fact that a certain king is called Mahāraya on his coins does not prove that he was not a Mahārāja like the modern tributary chieftains of British India. As we have seen the inscription is much later than the Manikyala inscription of Kanişka, and so it must be admitted that the Maharaya Gusana referred to in the former inscription cannot be identified with Kozoulo Kadphises, the predecessor of Kanişka. Mr. Bbändārkar places three other princes, riz., Kujula-Kara-Kadpbisa, the nameless king, and Wema-Kadphises before Kaniska, and, with an average allotment of twenty years for each reign, arrives at the year 200 of the Saka era as the date of the accession of Kanigka. But it is well known that Kozonlo-Kadphises, Kajala-Kara-Kadphisa, and Kozoulo-Kadphises are variations of one and the same name, and that the coins of the nameless king were issued by the satraps of Hima-Kadphisa.70 Mr. Bhändärkar finds a confirmation of his assignation of dates in the Mathurā inscription of the year 299, which he assumes should be referred to the Saka era. On this Mr. Bhāndārkar assumes that the Kuşaņa dates should be referred to the Saka era with 200 omitted. This would mean that at this time in the use of the Saka era the hundreds were both omitted and expressed, which is a contradiction in itself, but it has been shown that the Matburs inscription does not belong to the Kuşāņa period, and so further examination of Mr. Bhāndārkar's arguments is unnecessary. It is also futile to refer this inscription to the nine kings mentioned by Bühler simply because we find the title Mahārāja-Rajātirāja on their coins. The title is common among princes who aspired to over-lordship. The third theory of the last group is the outcome of the ripe judgment of Sir Alexander Cunningham who maintains that the Kuşana dates should be referred to the Seleucidan era with four hundreds omitted. The author finds that the coins of some of the Greek princes bear dates and cites two or three instances of this. These dates probably referred to the Seleucidan era. But. with the exception of the nnique tetradrachm of Plato, which bears the date 147, the occurrence of dates on other Greco-Indian coins are less certain.71 Recently it has been found that two Kharosthi inscriptions contain dates which may, with certainty, be referred to the Seleucidan era. The author proceeds to say that the use of Greek month names in Indo-Scythian inscriptions proves that the era used was also Greek, so probably Seleucidan, But it is to be observed that all three dates contain the hundreds, and if the Seleucidan era had really been used in the Kuşana inscriptions we would have expected to see the hundreds expressed instead of being umitted, since there is absolutely nothing to prove the omission of the hundred.72 The first theory of the second group was first of all put forth by Cunningham73 but was afterwards abandoned by him. It has since found an eminent advocate in Dr, J. F. Fleet. But Dr. Fleet has not yet published his promised paper on this period of Indian history, and I have been obliged to collect his arguments from among his scattered notes published in the Journals of the Royal Asiatic Society for the past four years.74 In all of bis papers Dr. Fleet maintains that the MälavaVikrama era is the historic era of Northern India, and that Kanişka was its founder. In support of his view Dr. Fleet quotes one of Dr. Kielhorn's Papers on that era, but I must admit that I have * Rapson's Indian Coins, p. 17. 10 V. A. Smith's Early History of India, Pp. 222, 242, and 243, footnote 1. 11 Rapson's Indian Coins, p. 5. 1 For Cunningham's theory see his Book of Indian Eras, PP. 41-42 * T 4. 8. R., Vol. II, p. 68, note, and Vol. III, p. 30. J .R.A. 8., 1909-4-5-6.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454