Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 37 Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 61
________________ FEBRUARY, 1908.] who died about B. C. 150. contemporary with Strato I, Rājūvula, the Saka satrap of B. C. 120. SOYTHIAN PERIOD OF INDIAN HISTORY. 55 Inasmuch as Heliokles, the son and successor of Eukratides, was the father of Strato II, who was approximately contemporary with Mathura, the accession of the last named prince must be very close to The fact that the coins of Rajuvula imitate those of Strato II shows that Rajuvula must be placed after Strato II and not before him, and nothing more than this can be said to be an accurate deduction. Numismatics is of importance only when epigraphy is absent. It may also aid epigraphy, but numismatics can hardly be relied on against deductions based on epigraphy and paleography. These two satrap dynasties possess several inscriptions, and it will be seen later on that the characters of the inscriptions of these satraps preclude any possibility of their being placed 200 hundred years before the accession of Kaniska. One of the highest authorities on Indian numismatics places the Saka satraps in the middle of the let century B. C.23 (2) Mr. D. R. Bhandarkar places Soḍāsa, the son of Bajuvula, in the Saka year 72 = 150 A. D., and Patika of Taxila in the Saka year 78=156 A. D., while the accession of Kaniska is placed in the year 278 A. D. (3) Dr. Fleet takes Soḍāsa and Rājūvula to be nearly contemporaries of Vasudeve. The inscriptions of the Scythian satraps occur both in Brahmi and in Kharosṭhi. They are as follows: (1) The Taxila copperplate of Patika, the son of Liaka Kusulake. The record is dated in the year 78 of the (reign of the) Maharaja Moga.2 (2) The Mathura Lion Pillar Capital incriptions, recording the various donations of the two satrap families of Taxila and Mathura. This record establishes that Sodasa was a contemporary of Patika and consequently Rajuvula of Liaka,25 The records mentioned above are in Kharosthi, while the others given below are in Brahmi(3) A Jaina record of the year 72 of the reign of the great satrap Soḍāsa, 28 (4) A Brahmanical record of the reign of the great satrap Soḍāsa,37 (5) An inscription found on a well at Mora, seven miles from Mathura.20 The Kharosthi inscriptions mentioned above form the third variety of Dr. Bühler's division of Kharosthi records. But as has been shown above, if the characters of the Manikyala inscription are taken as representing the fourth variety instead of the Sue-Vihar inscription, the difference between the forms of the characters of these two varieties diminish. The characters of the third variety show that they immediately preceded those of the fourth variety. The Taxila copperplate cannot be placed two hundred years before the Manikyala inscription. The paleography of the Brahmi inscriptions also supports the above conclusion. When Dr. Bühler's Indische Palaeographie was published, it was supposed that the difference between the Ksatrapa and Kusana periods was considerable. But recent discoveries have shown that this difference cannot be much. The excavations of Sarnath have yielded three records to the list of dated Kugana inscriptions. Two of these are from Sarnath, and the third is from Set-Mabet and was discovered more than forty years ago. The first line of the Srävasti inscription is much damaged and consequently the name of the reigning monarch and the date is lost. When Dr. Bloch published this inscription in 189829 he was led by the paleography of the 13 Rapson's Indian Coins, p. 8. 24 A. S. R., Vol II, p. 133, and plate lix.; J. R. A. S., 1894, p. 551; and E. I., Vol. IV, p. 54, and plate. 25 J. R. A. 8., 1894, p. 525. Dr. Bhagwanlal Indraji edited these inscriptions without any facsimile. A fresh edition with a facsimile is much needed, but this insoription is out of the reach of Indians as it is in the British Museum. 20 E. L, Vol. II, p. 199, No. 2. 37 A..S. R., Vol. III, p. 30, No. 1; and 1. A., Vol. XXXIII, p. 149, No. 24 24. S. R., Vol. XX, p. 49, plate v, No. 4. 2 J. A. 8. B., 1898, Part I, p. 274,Page Navigation
1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454