Book Title: Indological Studies
Author(s): H C Bhayani
Publisher: Parshva Prakashan

Previous | Next

Page 140
________________ 130 Prakrit and Apabhramsa Studies Gaccha. The author of the abridgement has made it clear that he has made selection from the Gathās composed by Pādalipta and that his tempering with the text of the original is confined to simplifying the obscure Deśya expressions. This clearly implies that an overwhelming majority of the original Gāthās have been preserved intact in the abridgement, so that we can take them as the genuine and authentic work of Pādalipta himself. The value of such a conclusion can be appreciated when it is recalled that the original Taraṁgavai is lost. It is no. 543. The text is as follows: āyāsa-talāe nimmalammi papphulla-camda-paumassa / maya-bhasala-calaņa-papphandiyassa jonhārao padai // The identity of TL. 543 with Svayambhūcchandas, Pūrvabhāga, 5. 4 is quite obvious, despite the variants pauma- for kamala-, bhasala- for mahuara-, papphamdia- for vihadia- and padai for phurai. Thus a Gathā ascribed by Svayambhū to Pādalipta is actually found in TL. which claims to be a faithful digest of Pādalipta's Taraṁgavai. 3. In the beginning of our discussion we saw that Gāthā 1.75 of the Saptaśataka (henceforth abbreviated as SS.) is according to the commentators either anonymous or by some Vāsudeva, but it is not ascribed by any of them to Pādalipta. Now if we look up for the author's name for the Gātha that just precedes, viz. 1.74, we find that it is either Pālittaka (according to Bhuvanpaāla) or Paulinya (according to Pitāmbara). paulinya can be readily explained as a scribal corruption of pālitta : pālitta misread as pālinna, which, with a preceding danda mis-interpreted as padimātrā, would yield polinna, which was Sanskritized as paulinya. It is not unlikely that due to some confusion, in some cases there crept in an error of one in the tradition of author-ascription as found in some MSS. of the commentaries of the SS. We find a similar discrepancy between Pitāmbara and Bhuvanapāla regarding the author-names for the first few Gāthās of the SS. 4. Here we may point out one more famous Gāthā which is quite reliably ascribed to Pādalipta. Under Siddhahema 1.187 and

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376