Book Title: Indological Studies
Author(s): H C Bhayani
Publisher: Parshva Prakashan

Previous | Next

Page 208
________________ 198 Prakrit and Apabhramśa Studies ņai pavara palāsa te coddaha rakkha vane samcārima phullia / nimisaddhem sara-sallia // ‘Like excellent Palāšas in motion that had bloomed forth in the forest, those fourteen Rākşasas were within a trice pierced with arrows.' It now becomes obvious that the situation described is one wherein Rāma destroya the fourteen attacking Rākşasas sent by Khara on Sūrpanakhā's incitement. In Vālmiki's parallel description13 the fourteen Rākşasas, pierced and blood drenched, fall like trees when their roots are cut off' (chinnamülā iva drumäh). 8. Several other illustrative citations, but all anonymous, in the Apabhramśa section of the Svayambhūcchandas, have clear, reference to some character or incident in the Rāma narrative. Since as many as ten of the anonymous illustrations of the Sc. could be identified from Svayambhū’s Paumacariul4 it was but natural to assume that the rest of such illustrations were from one or another work of Svayambhū himself.15 But there were several snags in such a solution. Sc. VI 50.1 (reference to Rāvana and Nila), 52.1 (ref. to Angada and Rāvana) and 68.1 (ref. to Vāli's son i.e. Angada) doubtles pertain to the theme of Rāmāyaṇa, they have been cited anonymously, and yet they are not identifiable from Svayambhū's Paumacariu. Similarly Sc. VI 35.1 (ref. to Bhārata, Karņa and Arjuna), 44.1 (ref. to Arjuna and Droņa), 75.1 (ref. to Hari i.e. Krsna and Mathurā), 78.1 (ref. to Dhananjava i.e. Arjuna), 122.1 (ref. to Kệpa, Karņa, Kalingarāja, Jayadratha and Krsna), 124.1 (ref. to Sātyaki, Hanumat-banner and the sakațavyūha); VIII 1.1 (ref. to Dhịtarāṣtra and Duhśāsana), 5.1 (ref. to Kurupati i.e. Duryodhana and the Vyāsa lake) and 10.1 (ref Karņa), even though anonymous and pertaining to the narrative of the Pāndavas and Krşņa, are not identifiable from Svayambhū's: Ritthaņemicariu.16 Moreover Sc. VIII 14.1, although given anony-- mously, cannot be from the pen of Svayambhū who was a devout Jain, whereas the stanza in question refers to the story of Vāmana. incarnation and the demon-king Bali17 so well-known in Brah

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376