Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 24
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 157
________________ 132 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA. (VOL. XXIV. Såmantavarman, as would appear from his Dhanantara plates, which are not dated but sro assigned to the seventh century A.D. on the evidence of their more archaic characters. Two points are noteworthy in this last-mentioned record ; firstly Samantavarman does not bear any royal title ; secondly he is described as sva-bhuja-bala-parākram-ākrānta-sakala-Śrētak-adhirajya. This latter epithet, we know, occurs in connection with many other Ganga kings, with the only difference that there it has Kalinga instead of Svētaka. From the above observation we may conclude that Samantavarman must have been a petty chief, ruling over a small territory called Svētaka after the name of the capital city. Incidentally, this last reference further supports the theory of the separateness of the Svētaka branch of the Early Ganga kings of Kalinga. As will be seen below, Samantavarman later on rose from his humble position to considerable power. Recently, an important discovery has been made in the shape of a copper plate grant. The charter is likewise issued from Svētaka. It is dated and records the gift of a village, named Phērava, to four Brāhmaṇas. The donor is Mahārāja Sāmantavarman who has been rightly identified with Samantavarman of the Dhanantara plates. The identification is vouched mainly by the similarity of the script used in both the records. It may be noticed that in the Phērava grant Samantavarman is styled Mahārāja and bears the more common epithet sva-bhuja-balaparākram-ākrānta-Kaling-ādhirājya, whereas in his Dhanantara plates he bears no such title as Mahārāja and his corresponding epithet there contains Svētaka and not Kalinga. This indicates that, during the interval between the times of the issue of his Dhanantara plates and Phērava grant, Sämantavarman somehow or other managed to have his dominions expanded and thereby to acquire more authority. We have at present no means to ascertain either the exact duration of that interval or the circumstances that led to his success and achievements. As has already been remarked, the Phêrava grant is dated ; and that is again a point inviting controversy. The dateis expressed only by three numerical symbols which the editor, Mr. Sarma, has read as 185. The first and the last figures no doubt represent 100 and 5 respectively The middle one, however, answers neither to 8 nor to 80, as a comparison of it with the known symbols of those numerals will prove. Mr. Sarma's reading of the date as 185 is thus not warranted. The precise value of the disputed symbol cannot be determined unless we come across the same sign used elsewhere in a Ganga record in a date expressed both in words and in numerical symbols. Tentatively, however, I propose to explain the sign under discussion as representing 6, because it closely resembles the symbol for six occurring in the Komarti Plates of Chandavarman of Kalinga. The date would thus be the year 165 and not 185. No era has been specified in the record, but the year 165 possibly refers itself to the Gangěya era. According to Mr. Sarma's reading of the date as the year 185 of the Gangēya era, Samantavarman becomes contemporaneous with Gunārņava's son Dēvēndravarman, a Ganga king of Kalinganagara, whose records of the years ranging from 183 to 195 of the same era are known. 1 Above, Vol. XV, pp. 275 ff. 1 This has been edited by Mr. M. Somasekhara Sarma in Bharati (Telugu), Vol. XIV, Pt. I, 1937, pp. 223 f. and Plates; and J. O. R., Vol. XI, Pt. I, 1937, pp. 55 ff. (and Plates, ibid., Pt. II). * The date portion has come out more distinct on the plates accompanying Mr. Sarma's article in Telugu. For the signs of 8 and 80 see above, Vol. XVII, plate facing p. 333, text I. 23; Vol. III, plate facing p. 129, text l. 23, has the symbol for 80, and Ind. Ant., Vol. XIII, plate facing p. 121, test 1. 20, has that for 8. Above, Vol. IV, plate facing p. 145, text I. 20. It will be seen that in both the cases the symbol is iden. tical in form with the letter ha of the alphabet used, but that in the case of the Kömarti Plates it has the sign of medial & added to it. .See Bhandarkar's List of Inscriptions of Northern India, Nos. 1478, 1479 and 2048 ; also I. H. Q., Vol. X, p. 301.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472