Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 24
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 228
________________ No. 26.) THREE INSCRIPTIONS OF VAIDUMBA-MAHARAJA GANDATRINETRA. 189 his relatives, the Nolambas, who were in open hostility with the Bānas and met on different frontal of battle such as Söremați, Mudumaduvu, Tiruvula, Mändāvuda, etc., the Baņas and Permanadi, i.e., Nanniya Ganga who had been joined by the Vaidumbas on account of the common enmity with the Nolambas and the Cholas. Since Satyaväkya Răchamalla and Nanniya Ganga were the rival claimants to the Ganga throne at this period, they both appear to have been called Permānadi' in the records of their respective subordinates or allies. Thus. Permanadi' of the Kaļakattur record of Noļambadiyarasa apparently refers to Rāchamalla while that occurring in the Bāņa inscriptions such as Bangavādi, Chadalla and Rayaköţa epigraphs mentioned above refers to Nanniya-Ganga, the refugee of the Bāņas who were instrumental in placing him on the Ganga throne at Talakādu. Among the allies that met at Söremați, Răchamalla was evidently Satyavākya Rāchamalla II, Nolambi was Mahēndra and Mayindadi, who was otherwise known as Mayindiramikkirama, was probably identical with the Chola king Mayindamachola-Mahārāja who is referred to as king in an inscription at Hirēbidanūr.. Dadiga was possibly the Dadiga of a Gõribidanūr' record who figures as an ally of (Noļamba) Mahēndra. It is not impossible that this Dadiga was Chantamāna-Dadi who, as stated in inscription C below, fought with Gandatrinētra on behalf of Nolambi. It must be as a preliminary to or in the course of the fateful battle of Söremaţi that Mahēndra sent under the orders of Permānadi, i.e., Rachamalla II, his officers Kāduvetti and Maduva to seize Talakādu which was now, as stated above, in the hands of Nanniya-Ganga and to invade Pulinādu on the way. This intensive fight finally resulted in glorious victory to Mahēndra. Pulinādu of the Bāņas was captured, the city Permāvi was burnt, Nanniya-Ganga was dethroned and Rāchamalla re-occupied Talakādu. The Bāņa who was the principal aggressor in the struggle was routed and finally killed by Mahendra. In the records of Baragür and Dharmapuri 0, Mahendra is described as ruling the country in peace and quiet after having eradicated the Choras and other kinsmen and destroyed root and branch the Mahabali race. The latter is dated in Saka 815 (A.D. 892) by which time the event must have been accomplished. As the event is narrated as a fresh and recent exploit of Mahēndra, the Söremaţi battle which formed only an item in the long struggle must have taken place a few years before the destruction of the Mahābali race. Since Rāchamalla II issued his Biliyūr charter in his 18th year corresponding to Saka 809 (A.D. 887), it may be presumed that the battle was fought in about A.D. 885.11 The battle of Söremati proved fatal to the confederate allies. After Prabhumēru Vijayaditya, the Bānas are thrown into oblivion until the time of Rashtrakūta Krishna III who 1 Nos. 309 and 310 of 1923 of the Madras Epigraphical Collection and inscription C below indicate that these wero fought during the same period. The Lonkulas figure here as the enemies of Vaidumbas whereas in an archaic inscription copied recently at Tsadamu (Punganūr taluk), a certain Lonkuļāditya is represented as administering Sadambu under Vaidumba-Mahārāja. Probably on the eve of the Söremati battle the Lonkuļas availed of the general political chaos, rebelled against their masters and fought against them at Söremati (No. 310 of 1923) apparently on behalf of the Nolamba, etc. * Inscriptions A and B below; Nos. 513 of 1906 and 310 of 1923 of the Madras Epigraphical Collection. * Inscription below. • No. 309 of 1923 of the Madras Epigraphical Collection. Ep. Carn., Vol. X, Mb. 228. • Ibid., Goribidanur 69. Ibid., Goribidanår 78. The Nolamba enemy of Gandatrinētra was Mahendra. Madra. Epigraphical Report for 1913, Part II, para. 13, p. 91. 10 Ep. Carn., Vol. XII, Si. 24 and 38; above, Vol. X, p. 66. 11 Coorg Inariptions, No. 2. See also Arakalgad 24 and 26 the former of which mentions Teddayys MAR officer of king Nitimarga Nanniya-Ganga while the latter, dated in R&chamalla's 19th year (A.D. 888), refers to his desth in a fight.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472