Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 24
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 227
________________ 188 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA. [VOL. XXIV. kings are discovered,1 that of the Vaidumbas being paleographically the latest in date, it may be surmised that the Vaidumbas had not yet attained an independent position in the 8th century A.D. and must have consolidated their power only after Malladeva or Banavidyadhara. Accordingly they are found fighting with the Chōlas and the Bāņas at this period from whom they must have wrested Madanapalle and extended their territory on all sides so as to include in it the whole of Rēnandu-seven-thousand province. Their aggressive policy is noticeable in their records found in the Bagepalli taluk of the Kolar District which was included in the Nolamba territory. Finally the Chōla-Mahārājas appear to have been driven away from their country to a corner in the Göribidanur taluk of the Kolar District where, too, they had to fight constantly with the Nolambas under Mahendra." From the foregoing brief analysis of the political situation in the south-eastern Dekkan in the latter half of the 9th century A.D., it is apparent that the Vaidumbas and the Banas had by their aggressive campaigns created enemies of the Ganga, Nolamba and Chōla kings of the time and were biding an opportunity to give a decisive blow to the three powers. Such an opportunity offered itself in the cause of the Ganga Prithvipati I whose claims to the hereditary throne had been set at naught by Vijayaditya and his son Rachamalla I. Prithvipati appears to have proclaimed himself king, at least temporarily, with the aid of the Banas; for we find him as the reigning sovereign in a few inscriptions of the Punganur taluk which belong to the 9th century A.D. on palæographical grounds. But Prithvipati having been killed in a fight with Pandya Varaguna, the struggle seems to have been continued by Nanniya-Ganga who, as stated in an inscription of Hirebidanur, was the son of Prithvipati of the Ganga family. A record at Kibbenahalli in the Tumkur District informs us that Nanniya-Ganga, evidently the son of Prithvipati I, fought with Satyavakya Rachamalla who must be the second prince of that name. We also learn from an epigraph at Rayakōta (Salem District) that Mahabali Banarasa invaded Manne on behalf of Ganga who could be no other than Nanniya-Ganga. The Bana chief, presumably Prabhumēru Vijayaditya, was victorious in the campaign, as some of his inscriptions represent him as ruling over Manne in addition to Vadugavali-twelve-thousand province. It must be in the course of this fight that Nanniya-Ganga occupied Talakādu, the capital of the Western Gangas, and proclaimed himself king, with the regal epithet Nitimärga as shown by a stone record at Arakalgud." The only Nanniya-Ganga known to the Ganga genealogy is Būtuga II who was, however, a Satyavakya and not Nitimärga. Hence the Nanniya-Ganga Nitimarga of the Arakalgud record must be the son of Prithivipati only, who must have borne the surname Nitimärga as a rightful successor of Satyavakya Rachamalla whom he had ousted. It was on this occasion that Rachamalla II mustered his forces and sought the assistance of 1 Nos. 298-301 of 1905 of the Madras Epigraphical Collection, see also p. 186, foot-note 4 above. * Ep. Carn., Vol. X, Bagepalli 62. Nos. 326, 334 and 337 of 1912. Priduvayya-Pilduvipati-Prithivipati of these inscriptions has to be identified with Prithivipati I who sacrificed his life for his friend Aparajita in the battle of Śripurambiyam with Pandya Varaguna, since No. 337 bears an apparent reference to this battle in which the Pandya was one of the contending parties. See also Madras Epigraphical Report, 1913, part II, p. 93. No. 326 describes Pilduvipati as the younger brother of Durvinita. This Durvinita was evidently different from the son of Avinita who flourished in the 6th century A.D. Yuvaraja Marasimhha had apparently borne the surname Durvinita. Ep. Carn., Vol. X, Gōribidanur 4. Ibid., Vol. XII, Tp. 55. 8. I. I., Vol. VII, No. 4. The Banas are not known to have been the friends of the Western Gangas of the main line at this period. Ep Carn., Vol. V, Arakalgud 24. The pithets Satyavakya and Nitimärga were borne alternately by the Western Ganga kings.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472