________________
178
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA.
[VOL. XXIV.
therefore be now called Jayabhata IV and not Jayabhata III. Gurjara princes will, therefore, stand as follows :
Dadda I
therefore be more allod Jayabhasa Te and not Jayabhupa . The genealogical linear the
The genealogical list of the
Jayabhata I-Vitaraga
"Dadda II. Praśāntarăga
K. 380, 385, 391, 392
Jayabhata II
Dadda III-Bāhusahāya
Jayabhata III
K. 456
Ahirola
Jayabhata IV
K. 486 (two grants). Mr. G. V. Acharya, however, has rejected the genealogy proposed by Dr. Bhagwantal and has instead arranged the succession of these princes as follows:
Dadda I. K. 330, 346
Jayabbata I. K. 355
Dadda II-Bāhusahāya. K. 380, 385, 392
Jayabhata II. K. 405, 456
Ahirola
Jayabhata III. K. 486. It may be noted in this connection that Mr. Acharya nowhere mentions the biruda Prasantarāga, but as he assigns the dates K. 380, 385 and 392 of Dadda-Praśāntarāga to Dadda-Bahusehāya we must suppose that he identifies the two Daddas. The dates K. 330, 355 and 405 assigned by him to Dadda I, Jayabhata I and Jayabhata II are conjectural, as no records of these dates have yet been discovered.
In re-arranging the succession of the Gurjara princes in this way Mr. Acharya seems to have assumed that the Nausāri and Prince of Wales Museum plates dated respectively K. 456 and 486
1 Above, Vol. XXIII, p. 149.
