Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 24
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 224
________________ No. 26.] THREE INSCRIPTIONS OF VAIDUMBA-MAHARAJA GANDATRINETRA 185 were the Mahārāja and Baparasa on the one side, and Nolarbi, Dadiga, Rachamalla, Mayindadi and Gundigegulla (1) on the other. A Bangavādi records of Mahabali Bāņarasa adds that Permånadigal had joined the party of the Mahārāja in a fight with the same enemies at Mändåvuda. According to the Chadalla inscription. Mahabali-Banarasa roBE against Nolamba, Rächamalla and Mayindadi on the battle field of Söremaţi on behalf of Permånadi. Mayindadi's name is substituted by Mayindiramikkirama (Mahēndravikrama) in another inscription of Bangavādi dated in the 24th year of Vijaya Narasimhavikramavarman. The Soremati battle which took place during the reign of Gandatriņētra must have therefore been of great consequence for the history of the south-eastern Dekkan in this early period. An attempt will be made in the sequel to enquire into the causes that led to the meeting of these powers at Söremați and to ascertain the probable date when this important event occurred as also the result of this campaign. Two of the Vaidumba kings, viz., Manujatriņētra and Gandatriņētra, are stated to be ruling over Rēnāndu-seven-thousand country which, as we know, had been subject to the administration of the Cholas under Vikramaditya Satyadityunju. The Rēnāndu country comprised a major part of Cuddapah and Kurnool Districts along the valley of the Kundēru river. The Mālepādu stone inscription of the Chola king Satyāditya states that Siddhi-one-thousand (Siddhaut country) also formed part of the dominions of the Cholas. Since the inscriptions of these early Cholas are found in the Proddatur taluk of the Cuddapah District, Madanapalle and Punganūr taluks of the Chittoor District, besides Göribidanūr of the Kolar District, Mysore State, it may be sur mised that their territory extended almost over the whole of the Cuddapah and Kurnool Districts, part of Chittoor and the north-western portion of the Kolar Districts. This could not have been held by them intact from the beginning of their political career. For Pulinádu (in Punganūr) was mainly a Bana district and had been occupied by the Cholas in the course of their aggressive cam. paign.' Similarly Göribidanür which was included originally in the Ganga or Nolamba territory had been wrested from them by the Cholas in a similar campaign. The Rashtrakūtas who were engaged in battles with the Gangas, the Eastern Chalukyas and the Pallavas in the 8th and the beginning of the 9th centuries A.D. could not devote their attention to the expansion of their dominion in the south-east of Dekkan, nor could they have done so without subduing the Gangas and the Nolambas who ruled in the intervening province. The Bāņa (or Brihad-Bâņas;* who were originally settled in the Srisaila country in the 4th century A.D. lingered on and continued to rule in the Gooty province in the 7th-8th centuries A.D. as subordinates of the Chalukyas of Bādāmi. After the decline of the Chāļukyas, one branch appears to have slowly moved down to the south and taken service under the Pallava kings, protecting the north-western frontier of the latter's country. Their inscriptions are found in the 1 Ep. Carn., Vol. X, Mb. 228. * No. 453 of 1906 of the Madras Epigraphical Collection. 3 Ep. Carn., Vol. X, Mb. 227. . Above, Vol. XI, p. 337. No. 342 of 1922 and Ep. Carn., Vol. X, Bågepalle 69. In the latter, the Kirudore is thentioned as the limit of Rēnāndu. This might be the Kundēru river mentioned below. Ibid., p. 345, Postacript. • E.... Nos. 466 and 617 of 1906, 307 and 329 of 1922-23, 299 of 1905, 174 of 1931-32, of the Madras Epigraphical Collection; Ep. Carn., Vol. X, Goribidanûr 69, 72-75, etc. + Nos. 174 and 183 (probably & Chola record) of 1931-32. The Cholas could not have occupied this district without an encounter with the Bānas. • Talgunda Pillar inscription of Kakusthavarman (above, Vol. VIII, pp. 24 f.). Perbbanavanla is mentioned in an inscription of Srlvallabha-Maharajadhirkja, from Arakatavemula in the Cuddapah District (No. 474 of 1906). This Suivalabha is most probably Chalukya Vikramaditya I who according to the Gadval grant acquired the title of Srivallabhun after defenting the Pallavan. Nos. 333 and 343 of 1920 of the Madras Epigraphical Collection.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472