Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 13
Author(s): Sten Konow, F W Thomas
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 148
________________ No. 8.] CONJEEVERAM PLATES OF KRISHNADEVA-RAYA: SAKA 1444. 123 places. Instances of this have been pointed out in the text. Hore and there we find the confusion of long and short i and . We have =pratichin disam-asritan, 1. 87, for pratichirh disamasritai; disi sthitam, 1. 88, for disi sthitam ; pratyuha-, 1. 51, for pratyaha; purvakan, 1. 85, instead of pūrvakan. In the third plate i and u are represented only by a loop over the consonants. There is a redundant anusvāra previous to the double consonants nya and nya, o.g. pumnyair, 1.7, for punyair=; -avannyām=, 1. 28, for savanyāms; -dānānnys, 1: 30, for däninys; -hirannya., 1. 85, for -hiranya-. We have instances of redundant anusvāra before other consonants in-akhyā nm, 1. 79, instead of -akhyāms, and -samyuktanmaikabhögyam, 1. 81, for-samyuktamēka. bhogyam. Visargas are very often left out. If in some places they are wanting, they are superfluous in others. The letters ya, va, pa, ta and na assumo forms which are capable of passing easily one into another. There is confusion between the letters $a, shi, sa. We have nijavasē, 1. 16, for nijavasē; turiskar, 1. 18, for turushkam ; -asēshēshu, 1. 34, for -asēsheshu ; -shisaya., 1. 81, and -shisya-, 1. 82, for -fishya. We find the use of ta for tha in jatapratishļāns, 1. 53. The termination for the imperfect and the pluperfect 3rd person singular is omitted in a few instances, thus vyatant, 1. 20, instead of vyatanit; -akärshi, 1. 30, instead of rakärshit. In 1. 36 we have .dharchkamţită instead of dharotkanthitā. Such forms occur in the plates of Venkata I and II. As in the Vilupaka grant of Venkata Il for instance, a conjunct consonant is expressed by combining the full form of the first with the secondary form of the second consonant. This is specially noticeable in the case of rya. In certain cases, howover, ther sign is written over the line. Nna and ning are invariably expressed by adding the amusuára before the consonants na and na. Instead of double consonants only one of the consonants is written in some cases, thus muudabhūtasman-, 1. 12, instead of Eudabhūttasman- ; nivrityai, 1. 33, instead of w rittyam ; -rajadushya-, 1. 35, for -rajašcushya- ; datavana, 1. 85, instond of dattavi The inscription records the grant of the villages Kțishnarayapuram and Katapattu by Krishnadeva-Raya of the second Vijayanagara dynasty, who was at the time oncamped on the banks of the river Krishna. The donee is Chandrachūda Sarasvati, the head of the Conjeeveram Matha, reputed to have been founded by the great Sankaracharya. In the line of apostolic descent Chandrachada was the disciple of Mahādēva Sarasvati. Ho is styled Sivachetas (having his mind devoted to Siva), yatirāja (prince among ascetics) and dhimat (philosopher). He is also described as an expounder of the śāstras, as living at Conjeeveram, and as a great exponent of the doctrine of māya. It may therefore be inferred that the donee was a teacher of the Sankaracharya matha. This is supported by the terms of the grant, shisayaprashisyar(fishyaprafishyair) bhögyam, 1. 81 f., .e. the land was to be enjoyed by the donee and his descendants in the apostolic line. The religious seat of these teachers is known as Kamakatipitha, probably after the goddess Kamakõtyambikā of Conjeeveram. The matha itself is known as Saradā-matha to this day. The vilmges are given in perpetuity as sarvaminya, to be enjoyed by the donee and his descendants in the apostolic line. The grant makes it clear that the villages had clearly marked boun. daries. It is interesting to observe that the king reserves no right to himself over the land thus given away. All rights of property in the land, the products on it, in it and over it belong to the donee for ever, together with any unforeseen or unearned increments that might accrue on the same. The terms of the grant display a knowledge of the technicalities of the law of property. 1 Ep. Ind., Vol. IV, pp. 269 ff. ? Indra Sarasvati or merely Sarasvati is the appellation of all the Acharyas of the Kamakoli pitha of the Särada Matha of Conjeeveram. The Acharyas of the Sringeri Matha founded by one of the Sankaracharyas style themselves Bharati. See below No. 8. R 2

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430