Book Title: Doctrine of Jainas Author(s): Walther Shubring, Wolfgang Beurlen Publisher: Motilal BanarasidasPage 77
________________ AN HISTORICAL SKETCH OF JAINISM since this does not mean a branch but the religious centre of the Digambaras. For it was the Mūla-samgha from which by means of integration (samghattana) in earlier times Arhadbalı had formed the samghas called Simha, Nandı, Sena?, and Deva. This we learn from inscriptions dated 1398 and 1432 A.D.), from the Nītisāra: composed by Indranandın between 1524 and 1565, and from Pattāvalis of the last centuries. In the latter works those four names are explained by the special praxis of individuals, and the fact is stressed that these four samghas harmonized with each other, though the measures taken by Arhadbali were meant to be an act of pacification after controversies had shown up in the course of time (kāla-svabhāvāt). Acc. to the latter inscription the classification was made after Akalanka's death (2nd half of the 8th century). In the 12th-13th century, however, there was once more a Mula-samgha. At least the Nandi-s. was divided into gana, gaccha and valı (bali), and its adherents had as a second name of the words of candra, kirlıdeva, bhūşana, and nandın5. $31. We now turn back to the Svetāmbaras. If we were certain about the time when the three smaller texts going by the name of cūliyā were composed, we should know at what date the declines from the normal level described by them had occurred. The prophesy pointing at 1990 after Mv. rendered in the Vaggacūliyā leads to the 15th century A.D. which cannot be the date of their origin Here we are told of the disrespect shown towards sacred texts. From the Angacūliyā we learn that partly with the superiors' knowledge and consent persons slipped in without being formally accepted. Their exposure then led to 1 IA 20, 350, Vțsabha 2 First (with translation ) ed by RICE, Ep. Carn 2, 77, 82, improved by NARASIMHACHAR, loc cit (reved ) p. 128, 129, comp also p 87f. 3 HOERNLE IA 21, 84 4 HOERNLE IA 20, 341 ff, 21, 57 ff. 5 Ep Carn 2, 123 In the Pattāvali IA 20, 350, 21, 71 fails to have the word of deva The Sena-s has the words. Tāga, vira, bhadra, sena, the Simha-s simha, kumbha, asrava, sāgara, the Deva-s deva, datta, nāga, tunga (I A 21, 69, there langa instead of tunga) For a biographical list of the Acäryas of the Arungala-anvaya which was a subsection of the Nandi-s. since Akalanka, see HULTZSCH ZDMG 68, 695-700.Page Navigation
1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309