Book Title: Doctrine of Jainas
Author(s): Walther Shubring, Wolfgang Beurlen
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas

Previous | Next

Page 88
________________ DOCTRINE OF THE JAINAS We have seen that the Angas are not additions to something previously existing. Tradition, on the other hand, will have it differently in speaking of the so-called Puvva. They are no longer in existence. To explain the word, Abhayadeva in his comm on Samav. 130b says that the Angas were composed by Mahāvīra's Ganadharas (822) either immediately in the spirit of the preceding (pūrva) oral tradition or indirectly after first (pūrva) having established that tradition?. But he does not derive the Angas from the Puvvas. If this had been the case, the Puvvas would have been absorbed in the Angas. Instead we read in the survey of what the A. contain (Samav. 129a; Nandi 236b) that the 12th of them (which was lost) included the P. and other topics. Hence it follows that the two series were parallel to, not dependent on, each other. $38. It is in harmony with the misunderstanding according to which the P. were the most ancient evidences that some of them are said (Dasav. nij). 15-17) to have been the sources for canonical texts, viz. P. 6 (Saccappavāya) for Dasav. 7 (Vakkasuddhi);7 (Āyapp ) for Dasav. 3 (Dhammapannatti= Chajjīvaniyā); 8 (Kammapp.) for Dasav. 5 (Pindesanā). The remaining chapters of Dasav. are said to come form the Paccakkhāna-P. (9), vatthu 4, and from the same, vatthu 3, pāhuda 20, as the Āv.-nijj will have it, the Cheyasutta Dasão,Kappa, and both Vavahāra and the Ohanijjuttı. Utt 2 (Parīsahā) is derived from P 8, vatt hu 20. Moreover, one of the Gāhās preceding the Pannavanā refers to the P. (another one to the Diţthivāya, s.b.). For the present writer it is beyond doubt that it was merely a relationship in contents that has led authors to construe those origins, provided that the Puvvas did actually lie before their eyes This supposition is necessary since at all times imagination is keen on filling up evident gaps. In reality the name of pudda was due to the apologies of which the texts must have consisted. The lists mentioned count 14 P. and summarize them as pudda-gaya. With the 1 Comp. Āv 92 (106b) attham bhāsas arahā, suttam ganthantı ganaharā niunam. 2 JACOBI SBE 22, XLIV #; BAGCHI, J. Dept Letters (Univ. of C) 14, Nr g

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309