________________
Prakrit Verses in Sanskrit Works on Poetics
609
Following Mammața and Ruyyaka, Narendraprabha cites this gātha as an example of the figure Uttara (Second Variety - which occurs when there being many questions, there are many answers which are impossible i.e., do not ordinarily occur to one).
76. This gātha is already dealt with; vide ŚP S.No. (124.66), SK S.No. (69.393)
supra.
Following Bhoja, Narendraprabha cites this gāthā as an example of Svabhāvoktiḥ (mugdhānganāśrayā).
77. This gāthā "is already dealt with; vide KP S.No. (64.435) supra. Following
Mammata. Narendraprabha cites this gāthā as an example of Sandehasankara (for we cannot say whether Samāsokti or Aprastutaprasaṁsā is the figure in this gatha). His comment on the gātha is adopted verbatim from Mammața (KP, p. 760, lines 3-4).
78. This gātha is already dealt with; vide ŚP S.No. (91.59), SK S.No. (4.340) supra.
Following Bhoja Narendraprabha cites this gātha as an example of Adhikam, one of the Upama-dosas. As 'bhramaragana', the attribute of the Upamāna is 'adhika' (redundant), the gātha is vitiated by the poetic blemish (or defect), called dharmadhikatva (or adhikopamānam.)
79. This gātha is already dealt with; vide ŚPS.No. (90.59), SK S.No. (3.340) supra.
Following Bhoja, Narendraprabha cites this gātha as an example of dharmanyūnatvam (or, nyūnopamam). His comment on the găthā is : 31 नेत्रबाहूपमानपदानि वधूविशेषणत्वेनाभिहितानि (? विशेषणत्वेन नाभिहितानि)। पृ. ३३५. Cf. Bhoja's comment : 347 741644196Hi gyfartautarachcalled 4794441
– paradt, 9. R.
