________________
Prakrit Verses in Sanskrit Works on Poetics
661
and comparing the foot of his sweetheart with King Vikramāditya.
86.599. Viśveśvara cites this gātha as an example of the figure Samādhi (which
occurs when a certain work becomes easy of accomplishment owing to the association of another cause), and remakrs : अत्र मानापनोदार्थं प्रणते पत्यौ तदभावेऽपि तत्पृष्ठे पुत्रसमारोहणरूपविलक्षणचेष्टाहासगम्यो मानत्याग : । 9. 300.
87.599. This gātha is already dealt with; vide ŚP S.No. (145.71); SK S.No. (91.358)
supra. Visveśvara cites it here as an example of Visama (Kevalanistaprāptau) and remarks: अत्र नायकविषयकानुरागव्यञ्जकाभावत्वेन इष्टानां तददर्शनादीनामन्यनिष्ठतद्विषयकज्ञानरूपानिष्टप्राप्ति : । - q. 300.
88.599. Viśveśvara cites this gāthā as an example of the figure Vişama (II), where
the quality and action of a cause are mutually opposed to the quality and action respectively of the effect. This gāthā illustrates the form where the actions are mutually opposed; Viśveśvara comments: अत्र हस्तस्य राजजनकत्वम्, तस्य प्रतापजनकत्वम् । हस्तप्रतापनिष्ठ-तृष्णाहरण-दहन-क्रिययोर्विरोध इति
face 1 89.599. Viśveśvara cites this skandhaka from Setu as an example of Ekāvalī (which
occurs when each succeeding thing is either affirmed or denied as a qualification or attribute of each preceding thing). It may be mentioned incidentally that the commentator Rāmadāsa identifies the figure in this stanza as ' siguri' (p.250).
90.599. Visveśvara cites this skandhaka from Setu as an example of the figure
Smarana (Reminiscence) (which arises when an object, which has been experienced or perceived before as possessed of a certain form is recollected exactly as it was experienced before at the sight of a similar object). He comments on this as follows: अत्र श्रीरामबाणप्रहारेण पर्वत-भूमि-समुद्राणां वज-वराहभुज-मथनाघटितानां स्मरणमुपन्यस्तम् । (पृ. 320).
91.600. Viśveśvara cites this gătha as an example of the figure Bhrantimăn (which
arises when the upameya is mistaken for the upamāna); he comments on
