Book Title: Sambodhi 1989 Vol 16
Author(s): Ramesh S Betai, Yajneshwar S Shastri
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 119
________________ 110 In English, we have two words, to differ' and '10 dcfer',; The French word 'diffèrer' has botli these senses i.e. it is used for differing as well as 'deferring'. Derrida's Diffèrance ('Differanz' in Gerinan) can refer simultancously to all these senses i.e. to diffèrance as spacing as well as diffèrance as temporizing. Derrida refers to Saussure's concept of the arbitrary and differential character of sign at the foundation of general semiology and shows that the principle of difference as the condition of signification applies to sign as both signifier and signified and hence the signified concept is never present in and of itself. Every concepi rel'ers to the other concept within a system by ineans of the systematic play of differences. Derrida shows that the neographism "differance" is neither a word nor a concept. According to Derrida, his deliniation of differance is a strategy without finality. As Derrida puts it, "Such a play of differance is thus no longer simply a concept but rather the possibility of conceptuality... For the same reason différance is not simply a word, that is, what is generally represented as the calm present and self-referential unity of concept and phonic materials Thus according to Derrida, in language, there are only differences, these differences play and they are themselves effcets, Differance is thus snon-full, non-simple, structured and differentiating origin of differences... Thus the name 'origin' no longer suits it." Language, according to Derrida, is "constituted as a weave of differences, but 'production', 'constitution', etc,, are used by Derrida only for their strategic convenience. because there is no subject, substance, or a being which is the foundation of the play of differance. Differance has no ontological weight. Differance, as a structure and movement, has three aspects. First, the play of differences among elements constitutes signification. Second, the play of traces of differences within each element also contributes to signification. Thus the trace of that which is absent determines the structure of a sign. Third, the differance includes the play of spacing by which the elements relate to each other, i.e. the temporal interval divides the spatial presence.10 Thus meaning is not a transcendental presence. No element can function as a sign without referring to another element which itself is never present. Derrida objeets to the repression of differences, privileging of presence and the illusion that the meaning has been mastered and controlled by the writer and the reader, 11

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309