Book Title: Sambodhi 1989 Vol 16
Author(s): Ramesh S Betai, Yajneshwar S Shastri
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 223
________________ 19 about which our understanding does not vary': 10 In this sense only the Brahman is real which is unchangable, immutable and infinite. The unreal is 'that whose nature varies, changes and is subject to destruction.' Name and form world is, subject of change and destruction. Though it is real for all practical purposes, it is 'Mithya, apparent existence and unsta. The mundane world, thus, cannot be called real in the ultimate sense of the word. It is the only Brahman which is real in true sense. Now, if reality or Braluman, is non-dual, uncaused, uncreated, unchanging and the phenomenal world is mere appearance (mithy a), then the question naturally arises how this non-dual pure consciousness, i.e. Brahman appears as unreal manifold world of phenomena ? How from the pure Brahman, the impure world of men and things came into existence ? Advaitin has to explain how the one became many? How this absolute is related to phenomenal world ? If Brahınıan be the cause of the world, will not the blemishes of the latter pertain to the former also ? will not Brahman cease to be truth, intelligence and bliss? Will not the nondifference of Brahman be destroyed ? By merely stating that Brahman illusorily appears as the world will not satisfy the curiosity of jaquirer into truth. Advaitins have to answer how the real appears as the trsnsitory world. To attribute any kind of causality in an absolutely real sense to the immutable, uncreated and transcendental Absolute will be logically absured. Sarkara-the Advaita stalwart, thought that without the assumption of an extraneous principle, (which is already found in seedling form in the Upanişads)'?, it is not possible to account for the world-appearance. There must be admitted some principle or power which superimposes the manifold of sense on the supersensuous supreme Braliman. This extrancous principle is called Māya by Sankara. This doctrine is specially introduced by Sankara as an explanatory factor and to satisfy the natural curiosity to know the why and how of appearances. This doctrine is a logical necessity for all the Absolutists to explain the otherwise inexplicable relation between the universe and the Absolute. Owing to this Mäyä, the Brahman though itself absolutely non-dual, appears to be holding up diverse, discrete and finite appearnaces as innumerable, animate and inanimate objects of the universe. It is Māya which gives rise to all kinds of phenomenal appearances recognised as various empirical entities (Vyävahārika) and also to further appearances some times known as illusory objects (Pratibhāsika). So, besides one, non-dual Absolute Reality-Brahman, there has to be assumed a universal diversifying factor or effectuating principle. This principle is called Mäyä. It must be accepted, however illusory in its ultimate

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309