Book Title: Sambodhi 1989 Vol 16
Author(s): Ramesh S Betai, Yajneshwar S Shastri
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 149
________________ 140 personal experience of tlie seers who become directly aware of an Infinite Spiritual Presence beyond and within the range of the world of change and succession. The personal experience of union with Absolute Reality or God has been a common and continuous feature of all the faiths of mankind.”42 Once the distinction between the Absolute and God is eliminated, Radhakrishnan's metaphysical absolutism turns out to be a kind of Višistadvaitic theism comparable to that of Rāmānujachārya or of Sri Svāminārāyaṇa. While appreciating Rāmānujāchārya's contribution to philosophy, Radhakrishnan has observed that, "Rāmānuja had the greatness of a religious genius. Ideas flowed in on hinn from various sources--the Upanişads and the Agamas, the purāṇas and the prabandham--and he responded to them all with some side of his religious nature. All their different elements are hell together in the indefinable unity of religious experince. The philosophic spirit was strong in Rāmānuja, so, too, was his religious need. He tries his best to reconcile the demands of the religious feeling with the claims of logical thinking. If he did not succeed in the attempt to give us a systematic and self-contained philosophy of religion, it should not surprise us. Much more remarkable is the deep earnestness and hard logic with which he conceived the problem and laboured to bridge the yawning gulf between the apparently conflicting claims of religion and philosophy. A thin intellect with no depth of soul may be blind to the wonders of God's ways, and may have offered as a seemingly simple solution. Not so Rāmānnja, who gives us the best type of monotheism conceivable inset with touches of immanentism."43 Radhakrishnan and others have pointed out that, Rāmānujācārya's višiştādvaita is involved in certain difficulties related to (i) the teleological character of the world, (ii) moral and inetaphysical status of individual souls and (iii) transcendental aspect of God. Sri Svāminārāyana's Visiştadvaita eliminates these difficulties by re-formulating the very concept of S'arira-S'ariri relation. 4 4 In the Višiştādvaita of Sri Svāminārāyaṇa, the individual souls and material world are said to be "body of God in the sense that (i) they are pervaded by God; (ii) they depend upon God; and (iii) they are incapable of doing anything without the s'akti of God.”4 5 Thus the philosophical position of Sri Svāminārāyaṇa preserves the organic view of the universe without damagiug its moral significance and God's

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309