Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 59
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Charles E A W Oldham, S Krishnaswami Aiyangar, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarka
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 60
________________ THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [MARCH, 1930 uninspiring oanto xii as being the very acme of Gită poetry, while the sublime canto xi appears to him to be quite miserable trash. We feel sorry to admit that in this case Professor Winternitz's arguments seem to us just as little conclusive and convincing as those proffered by Garbe himselt. However, Garbe's theory did not meet with acceptance from all sides. Opposition came from scholars of very great authority, such as Oldenberg and Professor Jacobi, an opposition upon which we shall shortly dwell. Oldenberg, in an article called Bemerkungen zur Bhagavadgita, 14 somewhat strongly criticised the theories of Garbe from two different points of view. He himself, like some other scholars, 15 has made it highly probable that there existed once an older seśvara sāmkhya, which did not deny the existence of brahman, the Universal Soul. The argumentation of Oldenberg as usual shows his brilliant sens commun, and we cannot abstain from quoting the following words, which ought to be carefully borne in mind by every echolar concerned with Indian modes of thought : "Trifft dies18 zu, so entfällt damit die Möglichkeit, aus dem Durcheinandergehen von Äusserungen, welche die charakteristische Sprache des Samkhya reden und von Bekenntnissen zum Brahman auf Ubereinanderlagerung verschiedener Schichten zu schliessen. Wer diesen Schluss sicht, scheint mir allzuschr in den Anschauungen der groesen klassischen Lehrtexte und der Polemiken, die in späterer Zeit zwischen Sãmkhya and Vedanta hin und her gingen, befangen zu sein, das fertig entwickelte in die Zeit, wo die Entwicklung noch im Fliessen war, zu übertragen." Oldenberg also emphasizes the need of carefulness in suggesting the existence of an original niristara yoga. We should like to add that the very nature of the Yoga appears to us totally to preclude such a supposition.' However, Oldenberg also attacked Garbe's theories in detail, proving by numerous examples that the verses rejected by this scholar did often destroy the connection of ideas pervading different cantos, and that consequently this method of rejecting all the verses savouring of Vedānta could only lead to further confusion 18 It seems to the present writer that everyone who carefully reads through the original text together with Garbe's translation can only whole-heartedly subscribe to this criticism by Oldenberg. To quote only one instance which has been partly touched upon by Oldenberg ; Gerbe rejects the verse iv, 24 : brahmärpanam brahma havir brahmägnau brahmanā hutam | brahmaiva tena gantavyam brahmakarmasa madhina but wants to keep the following one (iv, 25); dairam eväpare yajram yoginah paryupäsate brahmägnäv apare yajian yajñenaivopajuhvati | This, of course, is pure assumption ; but it becomes even worse when we find that in the translation the first brahmägnau is rendered by: "das Brahman ist im Opferfeuer," while the second one is said to mean : "in dem Feuer der Heiligkeit"! The following verses (iv, 2630), which describe various kinds of sacrifices, are all preserved by Garbe, who, however, rejects the concluding one (iv, 32): evam bahuvidha yajšā vitată brahmaņo mukhe karmajan viddhi tan sarvan evam jnätvā vimoyase 1 A method which operates in this way seems to me worse than no method at all. 16 Nachrichten d. Ges. d. Wiss. zu Gottingen, phil-hish. Klasse, 1919, p. 321 f. 15 Op. Oldenberg, Die Lehre der Upanischaden, p. 206 1.; Nachrichten d. Ges. d. Wiss. zu Gottinger, phil-mist. Klases, 1917, p. 218 f., as well as Dahlmann, Die Samkhya-Philosophie, p. 5, and Edgerton, 4. J. Phi., xlv, p. 71. 16 Viz., the ruggostod existence of the Soluara Samkhya. 17 Cp. also Jacobi, Deutsche Lit Zeit, 1921, 721 f. 18 Oldenberg admits that the vv. iii, 9-18, which contain the general theory of sacrifice, may possibly be an interpolation. This may be pomiblo, or even probable, but not on the grounds adduced by Garbo. Cp. alao Jacobi, Deutsche Lit. Zeit., 1921, 720 f.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380