Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 59
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Charles E A W Oldham, S Krishnaswami Aiyangar, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarka
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 79
________________ APRIL 1930 NOTES ON KHOTAN AND LADAKA 67 6. Zhan-zhun. This is the name of the upper Sutlej valley, & very important province of the western empire (see Thomas, Sa-ou, 16). 7. Nubra, spelt gNub-ra, is found in M. I. IV. 8. 8. Gtsans-poi-'abrog-pa, spelt, in accordance with the Ladakhi pronunciation, rtsanspoi-'abrog-pa. It means the Dard population (who are called 'abrog-pa by the Tibetans) on the Indus. We might also think of the 'abrog-pa population on the Brahmaputra ; but that river is spelt glean.po and pronounced tear-po. That a portion of Ladakh was aotually known by the name risanis-po in those days is proved by Hsüan-tsang, who gives the name Sam pobo as that of a portion of Ladakh.-We find the reference in the chronicle from Tun-huang, I, 62 (A.D. 693), where the Brog-pas of the Rtaans-po are called up to fight against the 'A-zha in Turkestan. It was quite a natural thing to call to arms the Dards ('abrog-pa) of the Indus, for they were the subjects of the Tibetan king. In Chron. II. 70-71 (A.D. 696) we get the name of a town, apparently in the rischs-po district. It is Zind-mda, where the Tibetan king resided for a time. Zird-mdd means the aiming arrow.' It is probably the ancient and full name of the village of MDA, which is still the capital of the 'a Brog-pas of the Indus valley. Several names oocur in Turkestan as well as in Western Tibet, and it is, therefore, pot advisable to locate them in Ladakh if we find them in the ancient documents. Let me mention rGya, an important and well known town in Upper Ladakh. Andther place of the same name seems to have existed near Khotan. Then Ston-ade, meaning socording to Prof. F. W. Thomas 'thousand provinces,' according to my view 'empty (desert) province,' is a well known town in Zans-dkar; but according to the documents a place in Turkestan on the Chinese frontier seems to have had the same name. 'A-sba, a tribe, which is, according to the Ladakhi chronicles, one of the Tibetan tribes, called Se.'a-xha, but according to the results of Prof. F. W. Thomas' researches there are certainly other 'A-sha tribes between Khotan and China. Now let me add a few words regarding Leh (Gle). A place called Gle-obun, even Gleu, is certainly mentioned in the Turkestan documents. Ancient ruins in the Leh valley, in particular the graves in the vicinity of the Teu-bkra-shis-'od-mtho, show that Leh is a place of considerable antiquity. In the chronicles of Ladakh Leh seems to be a place of little importance, however, until c. 1400 A.D., when the Ladakbi kings pay a little more attention to it by providing it with a few buildings. In the fifteenth century they make it the oapital of the country. The name of the town is explained by the natives as being derived from gles, or hles (hlas=sheepfold). In ancient days the nomads are supposed to have travelled through the Leh valley, and to have there established their sheepfolds. This explanation of the name is corroborated by the fact that the neighbouring village below Leh is called Dgar-ba. And the word dgar.ba also means sheepfold.' To modern people a name meaning sheepfold' for a town like Leh appears extraordinary, because nowadays nomads are not seen in the vicinity of Leh; and the present people of Leh keep their sheep and oattle in stables con. nected with their houses. But about 2000 years ago, when the Gilgit Dards began to found their colonies along the Indus, they must certainly have met with Tibetan nomads in the entire territory of the Indus valley. I have met traces of former nomads even as far down a Khalatee. On the plain between the villages of Tin-mo-agan and Ba-lu-mkbar there are low walls, called thas, or sheepfolds, which the natives explain as the work of ancient nomads. It is such low walls which are supposed to have been the beginning of Leh. The ancient graves of Leh, which were described for the first time in my book Antiquities of Indian Tibet, point to a later time, when a dynasty with high culture was established at Teb. In that book I expressed the view that these graves might belong to the Kingdom

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380