Book Title: Nyaya Pravesha Part 1
Author(s): Anandshankar B Dhruva
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 21
________________ xix "} इति. It यत्रासौ वर्तते भावस्तेन संबध्यते न तु । तद्देशिनं च व्याप्नोति किमप्येतन्मदाद्भुतम् ॥ न याति न च तत्रासीदस्ति पश्चान चांशवत् । जहाति पूर्वे नाधारमहो व्यसनसंततिः ॥ may be said that the lines quoted after "a" in this passage have been introduced as a criticism of Pras'astapada regarding and it has been attributed by Dharmabhüṣaṇa (a Jaina writer of the sixteenth or sevententh century A. D.) to Dinnaga. This would show that Dinnaga is posterior to Pras'astapada. But, against this, it should be noted that the passage is quoted not as Dinnaga's criticism of Pras'astapäda's dictum, but as his criticism of the doctrine. Moreover, the value of Dharmabhuṣana's attribution of the passage to Dinnaga is very much discounted by the fact that Dharmabhuṣaṇa belongs to a much later age, which is some twelve hundred years after Dinnaga, when it might have been a tradition to attribute all criticims of सामान्य to Dinnaga, the great apostle, if not the founder, of the area. Against this, some consideration may be shown to the fact that if the passage could be quoted by a writer of the 13th century it may not be impossible for a writer of the sixteenth to know the name of its author. Assuming then that the passage belongs to Dinnaga, the primà facie deduction from this passage is further strengthened by the consideration that "Pras'astapada does not reply to Dinnaga's criticism, as he might be expected to do if he had written later than Diúnāga,' (Randle). But, as Randle has pointed out, the argument is far from conclusive. I would add that for the purpose of the argument it is not necessary to rely upon the passage quoted in the Sarvadare'ana-samgraha. If there be any value in an argument from silence, there is the silence of Pras'astapada who does not refer to any of Dinnaga's criticisms of a found elsewhere. (2) Vais'eṣika Sutra IX., ii, 1, (“aÌâ áâ æ áàìfù fâîìîâ exqfî à *") enumerates the real relations which form the basis of Inference. The Sutra is in harmony with the Buddhist view which divides as into कारण०, स्वभाव०, and अनुपलब्धि ०. But Pras'asta pada substitutes for these particular relations the

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 ... 228