________________
10
1. 16.
in the other ? The same word should be used in both the lines, either am or 43919. Answer: There is a difference between the two : '49' is for convincing another person (da); BThra is for convincing oneself (1944). This statement, however, does not seem justified when we remember that elsewhere अनुमान is said to be of two kinds, स्वार्थ and परार्थ. अपरस्त्वाह---Another possible objection : प्रत्यक्ष and अनुमान which are for आत्मसंविद् precede साधन And दूषण which are for परसेविद्. Consequently, the second line should be first, and the first second. Answer: A book is intended for the reader, and is therefore परसंवित्प्रधान, Consequently, साधन and दूषण which are aceias have been given precedence in the Verse. Another apswer : @a7a1T &c. The order is intended to suggest that end (self-interest ) is dependent upon pare ( benevolence ). This is extracting Ethics out of Logic! The latter answer, says the Vrttikāra, is given by 'others" (sport). Here is one more reference to earlier commentators. Recall supra "Fearnia FEAST: " &c. 21. I. P. 9. I. 6.).
Fm. a. antaalset &c. The eight terms contained in the fundaP. 11, 1. mental Verse which form the subject matter of the treatise are :
(1) ara, (2) teatHIA, (3) ****, (4) cura, (5) FT, (6) * HTE,
(7) SHTA, and (8) STCAT1A1E. FOT. 9. q. eta ahamira.–Objection : the study of the 2014, the subject P. 12. matter of the treatise, is thus the full, and not the two fargs, the
latter being & somewhat remote effect of the work. Answer : It does not cease to be & SA, though remote. The work has a series of scisma culminating in the attainment of the final goal (qaia). The final goal, however, should not be placed before an ordinary student of Logic (अव्युत्पन्नविनयगण:). SARF418-The book has a purpose both for the reader and
the writer. T epe Pima &o-Read siitepagestaca artifa for surela salata P. 41. bb. stalla. P.42... हेयोपादेयाभ्यां &c--उपेक्षणीय is included in हेय.
