Book Title: Nyaya Pravesha Part 1
Author(s): Anandshankar B Dhruva
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 178
________________ कृतकल is अव्यभिचारि of अनित्यत्व, but it is opposed to (विरुद्ध ) or contradicted by ted: Fict: taviana naman. The two 208 taken together cause doubt, and are, therefore, inconclusive. (3971: HRPETIT Maciranista112*: ogicalàa. N. Pr. P. 5. 11. 2-3). There are four kinds of fara or Contradictory Hetum (11) धर्मस्वरूपविपरीतसाधन---that which proves the very opposite of the intended ( 4). For example, in 4: fa: , the dama-proves the very opposite of fatura, that is, अनित्यत्व, Bince it resides in विपक्षs-अनित्य thirigg-only. (12) maggladanwhich proves the opposite of the particular which it is intended to prove. Example : Unca: 197: Ágraat PAAEFI997, i. e. the eye and other organs exist for something beyond themselves insumuch as they are things possessed of orderly arrangement in their constitition, e. g. a bed, a seat etc. which exist for somebody other than themselves. Here the e--his -while proving that there is something beyond the senses, proves also that that something—viz., which the Sāuukhya desires to prove is for the same reason is--that is poseessed of an organised body, a position which the Sankhya is not prepared to hold. The e here--giai--proves thu reverze of what is intended to be proved, viz. -iga instead of STETTI 81764. (13) Enfaatampa-That wbich proves the opposite of the time itself—that is the 90 or major term. For examples in भावः न द्रव्यं [ or न कर्म; or न गुणः ] एकद्रव्यवत्त्वात् or गुणकर्मसु च भावात् Harlaat, 348497912 and MGÅG 2017 are such go. For, according to the Vais'eşikas, have either no constituent 2638, for example, BTAIT, or are made up of more than one constituent cou, for example, 9z; but there is no 469 which is made of a single constituent 4. But *19-Being the Heart or the highest universal to which generalisation can be carried) may contain a single cou, for example, 81979. Consequvatly it (377) cannot be a fan. Similarly, it may be argued that wra is not a कर्मन् or a गुण, because it itself resides in कर्मन् B and गुणः (गुणकर्मसु भावात् ) whereas कर्मन् and गुण do not reside in other कर्मन् : or Tob. Thus, the Vais'eșika proves that in the bighest aruta,

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228