________________
is the same as that given above, together with the illustrations. The Fallacies of the Homogeneous Example (AT Riezka ) are : (1) The fallacy of Excluded Heto ( 19 hifaz ), (2) The fallacy of Excluded Predicate (alergairaa), (3) The fallacy called Excluded Both ( Spalle), (4) The fallacy of Absence of Connection ( 374974 ), (5) The fallacy of the Inverted Affirmation of the Example
(jauciana ). The Fallacies of the Heterogeneous Example (arrera) are:(1) Included (Unexcluded) Predicate, (919mqa), (2) Included (Unexcluded) Hetu ( Harian) (3) Both Included (Unexcluded) ( Tlayiqet ), (4) Absence of Disconnection ( ulaze ); and (5) Inverted Negation of Heterogeneous Example (fauticantats). It will be noticed that the order of (1) and (2) in the second group bere is the reverse of that of the corresponding fallacies in the first group, as enumerated in our text. So also in T and Ch. T has the same order both in the first and the second group. (See N. Pr. Part II G. O. S. p 21 Comparative Notes on P 5. 1. 20.) Dharmakirti's first three and the last in each of the two groups (Art and depi) are the same as those in Nyāyapravesía, except that he omits the words and paraphrases
असिद्ध by •विकल and षष्यावृत्त by अव्यतिरोकिन् ; which makes no difference in sense. But, between the third and the last in each group, he adds a new set of three 21-CINTA based on
, viz., sen5999, vienatif and wennai, and one more distinguishing अप्रदर्शितान्वय from अनन्वय in the list of साषयदृष्टान्ताभासs and अप्रदर्शितष्यतिरेक from अव्यतिरेक in the list of वैधHदृष्टान्ताभासs. Thus he has nine साधर्म्यदृष्टान्ताभासs and nine ARTEIRATES instead of five and five of the N. Praves'a. (see N. Bindu, Bib. Buddhica Ed. pp. 87-93. Dharmakirti's list is adopted in the Nyāyasāra of Bhābarvajña, and in the Pramana, Dayatattvälokälarkära of Vädi-Devasūri, & Jaina.
