Book Title: Nyaya Pravesha Part 1
Author(s): Anandshankar B Dhruva
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 177
________________ 53 like instances. In the example--17: szata: aracaia, 946af14: RE:' is tbe 47, ac etc. are the 4995, and they are all set. Thus, the a- 3 a1is 999 It is also विपक्षेकदेशवृत्ति. Thus:-the. विपक्षs of the पक्ष Are विद्युत , 3117.187 etc. some of which e. g. la possess a fiesta which others do not e. s. 3179121. So from the fact that is eh you can riot conclude either way, whether it is salaatit (the result of & volitional effort; hence, made ) or rm13 (the opposite ), examples of both kinds being found, such as घट and विद्युत् respectively. The हेतु is, therefore, अनेकान्तिक. (9) 3494&sia: #fa:--Residing only in a portion of the 999 and of the laas. In the example, 741 lay: 34581917, FT: 57: is the पक्ष, आकाश, परमाणु etc. are the सपक्षs, of which some possess appelen and some do not; for instance, afikis does and achig does not (cf. "Bár ar grà: N.B.T; also as defined in the Br. Nyāya 419&di gazah '-end qalu is a magca). Again, with Fca: 38: as पक्ष, घट सुख erc. are the विपक्षः, of which some are अमूर्त while others are not; for instance, ya is aga and zz is not. Thus, in the present example शब्दो नित्यः अमूर्तत्वात, the हेतु is उभयपक्षकदेशवृत्ति. It ( अमूर्तत्व ) sometimes goes with नित्यत्व and sometimes with अनित्यत्व, and is consequently inconclusive. (10) latragitaret a liiai--That which has an invariable contradictory, that is to say,' a not-erroneous contradiction : (Dr. S. Vidyābbūşana). This arises 'when a thesis and its contradictory are both supported by what ap ear to be valid reasons ( Vidyābhūsana ), what in Kantian terminology would be called 'antinomic reason' (Dr, Randle). The word is explained in two ways by Dharmottara in the N. B. Tika: (1) हेत्वन्तरसाधितस्य विरुद्धं यत्तन्न व्यभिचरति स विरुद्धाव्यभिचारी । (2) यदि व, विरुद्धश्चासौ साधनान्तरसिद्धस्य धर्मस्य विरुद्धशाधनादत्र्यभिचारी च स्वसाध्याव्यभिचारा.. द्विरुद्धाव्यभिचारी. ine.(1) अव्यभिचारीof विरुद्ध-which invariably proves the opposite of what is proved by another 29:; (2) he: which is at the same time thaill; i. e. that which is opposed to another in as much as it proves its contradictory, and is at the same time invariably accompanied by its own 74, that is to say, which is good in itself, so far as its own que is concerned. In the example Tag: anat: od para mala,

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228