________________
FOT. 9. 7. The Vrtti points out that even if the so-called 99 satisfied the
remaining part of the definition- gi i etc-it would be P 50 b 9812778 if it was 'eilafaz. =011. #. &. draagt fark--Not simply opposed or contrary to, but disP. 19, 1.19. proved by. For " qera:?" read '? 1 491219: " 1. 23 & ga:... 1240137 alegerea78=4&TRI SANA, i.e. stey means
the determined by 928; thus, for example, when we speak of & $59 of paddy, what we really mean is paddy of a certain
weight or measure, viz. '$5a.' FOT. . q. Teen FAGUARTSAT-The Vrtti points out, somewhat meticu. P. 19,1. 24, lously, that in all such dames ag' saarlanean etc. we are to
पञ्जिका. understand प्रत्यक्षप्रसिद्धधर्म-विरुद्ध etc, that is to say, the विरोध arises P. 50 b not from the pramåņa sen etc, but from the fact which is
disclosed thereby. -25. 9. 1941—There are nine kinds of Fallacious Theses ( 991a719 ) :P. 2. 1, 14. (1) A thesis is contradicted by Perception (serenita') e. g.
to 34»: 767:-- Sound is inaudible.' P. 3.1. 5. (2) A thesis contradicted by Inference (377aafa 'e o
farat 99:- A pot is eternal' is contradicted by the inference
'A pot is non-eternal, because it is a product.' (3) A thesis contradicted by coe's own doctrine (n ica )
e.g A Vaiseșika undertaking to prove ' facu: 74: '--'sound
is eternal.' (4) A thesis contradicted by public opinion (
e.g. "gra far:#7683 2 Fala galeria "-'A (dead ) man's skull is pure ( not untouchable), because it is a limb of an animate being; as, for example, a conch or a shell. Now according to public opinion the former is regarded as
untouchable, though not the latter. (5) A thesis contradicted by one's own statement (normal )
e. 9. 'Aral À prot'-My mother is childless.' This proposition is self-contradictory. But it is not clear whether a statement which contradicts one's former statement will come under this head. Of course, if the former etatement amounts to a doctrine it will be clasged as B aham,' but not otherwise.
