________________
11. 19-20.
GET
S'abara-Bhāşya. (Ch. Ed. p. 10); and "agte Tri Stiaana ega:afcenfe alieau"--Bhāmaha's Kūvpālamkāra IV.8. Of the four well-known aga or points relating to the composition of a book viz. aru*17, art , szaland #ara, the first is not mentioned here probably because, according to Buddhism and Jainism unlike Brāhmanism, any reader who feels interested in the subject is an अधिकारिन् . Of the other three, अभिधेय and प्रयोजन are mentioned expressly, and art by implication. Read " Haya gaya Alatal aj TATA" cf. " anti1793tamahalaangaa sala” (N.B.T.); also, "are esta a facukanaating 777FIRAT : Pisalar” Mim, S'I. Värt. 1-18. +++99891aThe portion shown as missing in the Ms. is probably "mai ". Thus, Rilar sadha: a7......79:--'-13' ( from fat ) is the science of the determination of truths {" नितरामीयन्ते गम्यन्ते-गत्यर्थानां ज्ञानार्थत्वात्-शायन्ते अर्था अनित्यत्वादयोऽनेनेति "). But I think the word '-419' as used for the Science of Logic is very significant: made up of the prefix f-down, and the noun from the root to go, it clearly points to the logical process of descending from the general to the particular, thug corresponding to Deduction' (de-down, and duco-I lead.). The word 'fanta (conclusion) tells the same story. lyre--The author of the Paājikā does not think that is a meaningless addition made by Haribhadra simply for the sake of filling up the measure of the anustubh verae. In this view be is justified by the fact that lower down even in the prose passage Haribhadra speaks of ' न्यायप्रवेशकाख्यं शास्त्रम्, , E lasterere sila sa it." (Pañjikā) From this it would appear that the author of the Pañjika knew the work as 'BITE! At the same time he says that this work of Te is a key of the FEI ("faceta
). It is, therefore, difficult to say whether the name of the work as known to him was 21494 (#) ora'. More probably it was ' ,' which he algo characterizes as ' n because Haribhadra has called his work ' वृत्ति' and refers to the passages of न्यायप्रवेश as 'सूत्र' For raqam Enta read forreth,