Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 60
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Charles E A W Oldham, S Krishnaswami Aiyangar, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarka
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 70
________________ 36 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [MARC#, 1931 than at Mylapore. Let us not forget that the agreement between Latin, Greek and Syrian writers for Calamina postulates a Calamina much earlier than the first dated or discovered mention of the name, and that therefore some of the undated references to it may be greatly older than the seventh century. Be Calamina ever so much older than the seventh century, there is Mr. Joseph's identification of Calamina with Chinnamalai and ours with Coroman. del, or Karumanal. If Mr. Joseph is not satisfied that Iothabis should be Mylapore, he must find it somewhere near the sea in North India : for the Syriac Breviary, a respectable authority of undoubted antiquity, places St. Thomas' tent and resting-place near the sea. Mylapore satisfies that condition, and Mr. Joseph looks in vain for a lothabis along the sea in North India. The Codex Fuldensis does not say that Mazdai's territory was in North India or that it touched on the sea. Let us now see whether we cannot make an advance with the St. Thomas question in other directions. * Could people in Malabar throw light on a purse of St. Thomas, which was always full of money, a bowl always full of food, & staff with which he had nothing to fear, and a sandal with which he could transport himself in a moment to whatever place he liked ? I believe I have found a reference to these four magical articles and to St. Thomas in a Hindu book studied at Bettiah, Champaran District, by a Capuchin missionary in 1769. The staff of St. Thomas is known in the Mylapore and Malabar Christian folklore. With it he struck the rock at Chinnamalai and caused the perennial spring to flow. I do not know of any Malabar legends about St. Thomas' sandals. From the Passio we understand that, like his pallium and colobium, they would not be worn out before his death. Those of St. Bartholomew had lasted 26 years, as had his cloak and colobium ; they did not grow old. In China a certain Tamo is represented as crossing a river or the sea on a stalk of wheat; he has a staff over his shoulder, and a sandal hanging from the staff. In 1613, the China Christians of Tenduo [more correctly lendo, i.e., India (?), according to the old Syriac books then in Malabar) were said to be still in possession of a shoe or slippers (sic) of St. Thomas. I understand that they represented St. Thomas with a shoe. That shoe or slipper (in the singular) helps us to identify Tamo with Thomas. Others had identified him heretofore with Thomas without the help of the text about the shoe. Tamo also wears a rosary. Also known in China is a certain Bodhi-Tamo, the son of a South Indian king, who came to China with nothing but his patra (begging-bowl) and his flabellum ; also, a foreigner from Syria, whence had come the Luminous Religion, who brought to China only his rice-bowland his vestments. Tamo, Bodhi. Tamo and the foreigner appear to be St. Thomas. Now for the magical purge of St. Thomas. In Central India, i.e., about Malwa and Bundelkhand, people who are not now Christians have tattoo-marks of many kinds of crosses, some indubitably Christian in shape, one of which is called a purse ; another name for such a cross is the flower of the lac-insect,' where the lac-insect points to Jesus. Another tattoo-mark, showing a cross within a circle, which is worshipped by two peacocks, and is called a sweetmeat, must be compared with the Bread of Tuma (Thomas), known in Manchuria, where it is formed and baked like a head or a hand,'" because Tuma had been martyred whilst preaching, and as an atonement for sin." Why should we not gradually bring China into line with India and Malabar ? Chinese still came on pilgrimage to the tomb at Mylapore in 1500. The Tartars who did the same in 1348 must have been Chinese. And now we learn from Godinho de Eredia (1613) that the Chinese of Chincheo (Fukhien), of whom there was a colony at Malacca, were descended from the Tochari or Chorii of Pliny, people settled between the Caspian and Turkestan, among whom there must have been Christians in the first centuries. Why is there a hare in the sun or moon, as I saw in the paintings or carvings of some churches in Malabar? I do not now recollect whether the hare was in the sun or in the

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394