Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 60
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Charles E A W Oldham, S Krishnaswami Aiyangar, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarka
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 180
________________ 152 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY (AUaust, 1931 commit thefts bear corresponding guilt and become the females of the animals above enumerated." All the crimes mentioned above deal with larceny in some form or another, but there are others which are much more serious. According to Hindu law crimes may roughly be divided under three broad headings : crimes against the property of an individual; crimes against the person of an individual ; and crimes against the honour of an individual. To the last group belong sacerdotal crimes and religious crimes or sins. An unfaithful wife, we are told, will become a jackal after death, and publish her shame to the world by howling dismally at night. The soul of a Brahmana, who drinks forbidden spirituous liquors, called surd, will enter the bodies of great and small insecte, moths, carrion-eating birds such a vultures and so on, and destructive animals. Men who take pleasure in inflicting pain become carnivorous animals; those who eat forbidden food become worms; thieves become creatures which devour their own kind, like fish. But more heinous still are crimes committed against the dignity of the twice-born Brahmanas. "He who kills a Brahmaņa, after a long process through different hells, is to be reborn as a dog, a pig, ass, camel, cow, goat, sheep, stag, bird," etc., and "the worst fate is reserved for those who commit adultery with the wife of a priest or teacher in former times a priest or a teacher was alwaye a Brahmana, and even today the office of a priest is reserved specially for a Brahmaņa); their souls are to return hundreds of times into grass, shrubs, creeping animals with claws and cruel dispositions." But the religious books of the Hindus say that nearly all these crimes may be atoned for by the person committing them, and a complete or at least a partial remission of the punishments may be obtained. In fact, the same lawgiver says that a man who omits to perform an action prescribed by the Sastras, or one who performs a blameable act, or one whe cleaves to sensual enjoyments, is obliged to perform a penanceand adds that penances are necessary for the sal, of purification, because those whose sins are not expiated are born again with disgraceful marks.8 Whether, however, any of the penances prescribed are applicable to graver crimes committed intentionally is not quite clear. The probability is that they are not. In one place it is said plainly that there can be no prayascitta for intentionally killing a Brahmana, but if the killing is unintentional the slayer must purify himself by erecting a hut in a dense and impenetrable forest and dwelling there for twelve years, subsisting on alms and making the skull of a dead man his drinking vessel. 10 And in modern India the unintentional slayer of a cow or a oalf must live on charity for a period of three or five years, and is not allowed to utter a word, although there does not seem to be any objection to bie making some inarticulate sounds. On the other hand, the slaying of a Sūdra is a comparatively petty offence in Hindu eyes; or rather it was till British justice ohanged the whole aspeet. The only punishment prescribed for such an action is the same as for killing a dog, an iguana, & cat, a mungoose, a blue jay, a frog, an owl or a crow, 11 even though the killing be intentional. Some of the prayascittas are severe in the extreme, as for example that for a Brahmana drinking spirituous liquor. If a twice-born intentionally drinks such beverages through delusion of mind, his penance is to drink it again boiling hot; only thus, when his body has been completely scalded by the boiling liquid may he be freed from his guilt 19 ; or, he may drink a concoction of cow's urine, water, milk, clarified butter (ghyta) and cowdung, or any one of these, boiling hot until he dies. 13 Laws of Manu, xü, 55-69, cited by B. Bonnerjes, L'Ethnologie du Bengale (Paris, 1927), pp. 113 f. 3 Latos of Manu, v, 164 ; ix, 30. 1 Cf. Laws of Manu, xii, 66. 5 B. Bonnorjea, op. cit., 114, citing Manu. Ibid. 1 Laws of Manu, xi, 44. Laws of Manu, xi, 52. • Laws of Manu, xi, 90. 10 Law of Mans, zi, 90, 73. 11 Law of Manu, xi, 132. 13 Laws of Mann, ri, 91, 13 Laws of Manu, si, 92,

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394