Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 60
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Charles E A W Oldham, S Krishnaswami Aiyangar, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarka
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 192
________________ 164 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY ( SEPTEMBER, 1931 The commercial equivalents in this table are taken from numerous foreign business records, particularly those of the Dutch, who were very punctilious in putting such matters on paper. It will be noted that merchants usually took the nearest whole number, neglecting fractions ; but occasionally they used simple fractions, as when the Gujarat Shahjahani was taken 88 36 2/3 lb. (English Factories, si, 110). I have not found in the chronicles any formal record to the effect that Akbar prescribed the unit which bears his name. The Ain-i Akbari (ü, 60) says merely : "from the beginning of the present reign it (the ser) was 28 dam, and today it is 30." This passage will be discussed in a later section; it is quoted here merely as showing that the 30-dám ser was introduced in the course of Akbar's reign. The inference that it was officially prescribed is practically certain, but the fact is not formally proved. The corresponding maund was in general use over a wide area when Dutch and English merchants first came to India, and it survived as a special maund used for certain commodities after it had been superseded in general use by the Jahangiri. The most noteworthy survival was in the Bayana market, where indigo continued to be sold by the Akbari maund until late in the seventeenth century. In the year 1619 Jahangir was told by a Hindu ascetic that according to the scriptures the ser ought to weigh 36 dám : I do not know the ascetic's authority for this statement, but Jahangir accepted it, and the Jahangiri maund dates from 1620 as a general institution, though possibly it had been introduced somewhat earlier for particular purposes. The introduction of the Shahjahani maund has not been traced in the chronicles, but it was in use in Agra in 1634 (Dagh Register, 22nd October), and later commercial reeords show that its introduction was effective throughout the empire, except in the markets of Gujarat. At the time of its introduction Gujarat was employing a ser of 18 ddm, giving a maund of just over 33 lb.; but Shahjahan ordered the local ser to be raised to 20 dám. This was done in Ahmadabad about the end of 1634, and in Surat in February, 1636, so that, to quote William Methwold,"now the maen of this place [Surat] is just the halfe of a maen Jehann [Shahjahân), which consisteth of 40 seares, and every seare 40 pice weight." (English Factories, v, 156.) I have not traced any definite origin of the Gujarat maund of 33 lb, which has just been mentioned. The fact that the corresponding ser was reckoned in dâm might suggest that it was prescribed by Akbar; but it is more probable that the unit was much older, and that the ser was found to weigh just about 18 dám when that cain became current in the course of the sixteenth century. As will be shown in a later section, the range of this unit was extensive, reaching as far north as the neighbourhood of the Jumna. This maund is familiar in commercial records from the time of William Finch, who, however, took it as 321 lb. (Letters Received, i, 34.) Finch noted that a smaller maund of 27 lb. was also known in Surat, but its use there was exceptional; this smaller maund brings us definitely away from the region of official prescription, and is discussed in the next section. A word of caution may be added on the risk of using any of these official maunds to interpret figures of a date earlier than that of their known introduction. The caution may seem superfluous, but I have seen & promising bit of research-work ruined by interpreting eighteenth-century figures in terms of the British standard maund, and it is well that students should always bear such risks in mind. (To be continued.) Memoirs of Jahangir, tr. A. Rogers, ed. H. Beveridge, London, 1909-1914; ii, 108 ; also the Persian text, ed. S. Ahmad, Aligarh, 1864.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394