Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 55 Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Stephen Meredyth Edwardes, Krishnaswami Aiyangar Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 82
________________ THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [ APRIL., 1928 It does not seem that Hargovind remained long at Kartarpur, which was situated in the Jalandhar Doab between the Ravi and the Beas.78 He continued his journey, crossed the Beas and "pitched his camp on the tumulus of an ancient village". Hargovind decided that this was a very suitable site for the foundation of a city, and ordered that the foundation should be laid out immediately and the whole work completed without delay. But the landlord and chauduri of the place appears to have raised difficulties. His son, Ratan Chand, complained to the Subahdar of Jalandhar, and a small army was sent against the Guru. Hargovind, however, succeeded in beating it back, and the city of Sri Hargovindpur was then founded. T9 After this Hargovind appears to have remained in peace for some time, but his restless character again involved him in hostilities with the Muhammadan government. It is said that two masands named Bakht Mal and Tara Chand were bringing two horses "of surpassing beauty and fleetness" for the Guru, but these again were seized by the Emperor's officials. An ardent follower of the Guru, named Bidhi Chand, who had formerly been a notorious highWayman and robber, and whose exploits in that capacity are described by the Sikh chroniclers in great detail, succeeded in recovering the horses from the Emperor's stable at Lahore. Thereupon the Emperor sent an army against the Guru. Hargovind thought it prudent "to seek shelter in some advantageous position," and he is said to have retired to the wastes of Bhatinda, south of the Sutlej, where it might be useless or dangerous to follow him.80 There, near the village of Lahira, a great battle is said to have been fought, in which again the imperialists were completely routed. The date of the battle is given as 16th of Maghar, Sambat 1688 (A.D. 1631).81 Mohsun Fani does not make any clear reference to the two actions described above. But he says that before and after the battle of Kartarpur, the last of Hargovind's battles against the Moghul Government, "Le encountered great dangers of war." As the battle of Amritsar is definitely referred to, it seems that in the meantime, i.e., between the first battle, that of Amritsar and the last battle, that of Kartarpur, the Guru had had to engage in some other minor actions. And the remark," with the aid of God he escaped unhurt, though he lost his property,"82 seems to indicate that he did not meet with decisive reverses. Mohsun Fani's remark, however, may as well refer to the personal safety of Hargovind; but, nevertheless, it is to be noticed that Hargovind's last battle was fought at Kartarpur, and therefore it is clear that after the battle of Lahira Hargovind found himself strong enough to leave his retreat and return to the plains. It is thus difficult to say what actually happened. The Sikh accounts state that "the Guru allowed Hasan Khan to return to Lahore with the survivors of the imperial army.”83 It does not seem probable that the Guru wil. lingly allowed them to retire. Hargovind had taken up his position in a very advantageous place. "The Guru's army was so disposed round the only tank in the area that when the enemy arrived they could not obtain access to its water, and thus must inevitably perish from thirst." 84 It appears that the imperialists could not cope with the natural difficulties of the situation and the Guru succeeded in compelling them to retire. After this Hargovind "watched his opportunity" and soon returned to Kartarpur. He appears to have lived for some time in peace, but troubles again commenced through the defection of Painda Khan. Who this Painda Khan was, we do not definitely know. On 78 Macauliffe, ibid., vol. III, p. 26. TA-Ibid., vol. IV, pp. 102-119; Panih Prakash, p. 115; Itihas Guru Khalua, pp. 160-166. See also Macauliflo's foot-note on p. 104. + Cunningham, ibid., p. 58. 81 Macauliffe, ibid., vol. IV, pp. 179-188; Panth Prakash, p. 117. 81 Dabistan, vol. II, p. 276. 93 Macaulifto, ibid., vol. IV, p. 186, Macauliflo, toid., vol. IV, p. 179; Panu Prakaal, p. 117.Page Navigation
1 ... 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370