Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 55
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Stephen Meredyth Edwardes, Krishnaswami Aiyangar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 206
________________ 192 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY (OCTOBER, 1926 THE RECOVERY OF THE GREAT BELL OF THE SHWE DAGON PACODA AT RANGOON. BY SIR RICHARD C. TEMPLE, BT. IN 1895 the late Mr. T. Hesketh Biggs published a small book on the Great Shwe Dagon Pagoda at Rangoon, and regarding that work the late Mr. (afterwards Sir Frank) McCarthy of the Rangoon Gazette wrote to me on the 18th February 1896 that " he says the story of the salvage of the big bell (the Mahaganda at the Shwe Dagon Pagoda) by the Burmese from the Rangoon river is a myth. I have a distinct recollection that you told me one evening at the Gymkhana Club [at Rangoon) the history of the rescue. Can you set the matter at rest? There is some controversy about it here." I was then at Port Blair in the Andaman Islands, and I have with me still all - the correspondence which ensued in the Rangoon Gazelle and its Weekly Budget. I publish it here, as it is of general interest and worth-preserving. On 11th March 1896, Mr. Hesketh Biggs wrote from Calcutta, acknowledging that he had made a mistake, as follows:-"The letter of your correspondent, O.L., in your issue of the 9th February1 settles the question of the story of the Pagoda Bell. I can only express my regret for my mistake, which I shall correct. In explanation of the view I took, I should say that in none of the accounts of the first (Burmese) War I was able to procure in Rangoon was there any mention of the story of the bell, and I was most positively assured by an old Burman, who was well acquainted with the history of the Pagoda, that there was no found. ation in fact for it. It seemed to me also incredible that the Burmang could have raised the bell from such a river as the Irrawaddy if it had fallen in any distance from the shore, and I, therefore, came to the conclusion that the story of this bell had become confused with that of the bell of Dhammacheti, which was sunk in the Poozoondoung creek. "I have come across another account of the recovery of the bell in a work entitled "Two years in Ava from May 1824 to May 1826" by an officer (Tarrant) of the Quarter Master General's Department, published in 1827. From his account the bell was rescued by the British, assisted by the Burmans, and it evidently sank not far from the river bank. The writer states; We made an attempt in April 1825 to send the great bell to Calcutta, and suoceeded with much labour and difficulty in embarking it on a raft to carry it alongside the Sulimany. The raft pushed off. Thousands of Burmans were looking on deploring the loss of 80 revered a relio of former times, when on a sudden it heeled over and sunk. There it remained for some months, but in January 1826 we raised it from the river, with the assistance of the population of Rangoon and replaced it in the Pagoda.'” Communications between Rangoon and Port Blair in 1896 were infrequent and very slow, so my reply to Sir Frank MoCarthy's letter was not published till 24th March 1896, when the following paragraph appeared in the Weekly Budget: "A correspondent, who is & recognized authority on Burmese antiquities, sends us a communication on the recent dispute about the great bell of the Pagoda. He is at too great a distance to have seen the later communications which set at rest the doubt as to the Adventures of the great bell. He says: 'There are two large bells on the platform of the Shwe Dagon: one of nine tons, placed at the South-East corner by Tharrawaddy in 1842 to replace one on the same spot, presented by Dhammacheti of Pegu about 1460 and subsequently removed and dropped in the Pazundaung Creek by Maung Zinga (Philip de Brito) about 1600; the other of 22 tons, the Mahaganda (or great bell), presented by Shinbyuyin in 1768 and dropped by the English in the Rangoon River, being removed and replaced in January 1826 by the Burmese. J. E. Alexander saw and described the operations, Travels from India to England, • 1827, p. 46." This is the passage recently quoted in our columns from Alexander's book. 1 This letter is not now forthcoming.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370