Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 55
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Stephen Meredyth Edwardes, Krishnaswami Aiyangar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 213
________________ OCTOBER, 1928 ) BOOK-NOTICES Give me a besar!0 for my nose, father, and jewels of gems. Give me earrings, father, and jewels of gold-leaf. Give me a necklace, father, and a jewelled garland. Give me for my arms, father, niwal, anwat and bichhud. Give to my king, father, a horse and kine and calves. Give me a palanquin, father, and maids to follow me. Give me all this, father, and the maharol of my dark bridegroom. Give me, father, to that household which weighsite gold in scales. 5. Cut down the mountain bamboo, father. Make a shed for the marriage. Make a shed of green bamboos. BOOK-NOTICES. DRAVIDIAN INDIA, by T.R. SESHA AIYANO AR, classical Tamil has exercised on the formation and M.A., M.R.A.S., F.R.H.S. development of both the Vedic and classical Sanskrit The problem of Dravidian History has not yet is gradually coming to be recognised by students been solved satisfactorily by any scholar. Mr. Sesha of Indian philology. Aiyan gar makes an attempt to unravel some of the On page 64 of his book, he rolor to the conoluknotty points in that problem. To be the author of sions arrived at by Mr. R. Swaminatha Iver. which & treatise on Indian History (though Dravidian) al 'knook the bottom out of the theory of Dravidian good knowledge of Sanskrit and Philology coupled influence over Sanskrit. Mr. Sesha Aiyangar shows with critical and historical acumen is necessary. The himself to be neither willing to acoept the viows of spelling of certain very common Sanskrit words Mr. Swaminatha Iyer, nor to offer a satisfactory ex. in English, as the following, bears sufficient testi planation himself. The more quotation of Pandit mony that the qualifications of the author are not Savarairoyan's views is no answer to the questions quite adequate. Mr. Aiyangar writes raised by Mr. Swaminatha Iyer. Moreover, some Kishkinds for Kişkindha of the derivations given by the author make curious Dundubhi reading : for instance, the derivations of : Botham Bodham Sanskrit. Tamil. Vivekanandha Vivekananda karnira from கருமான் Subramanya Subrahmanya mukta " முத்து Ashwathama Afvathaman vrihi yfa Upam Yupam These are typical and they do credit to the Ukan Yakam, etc. enthusiasm of our author for everything Tamil These instances are chosen at random and there! One interesting feature of the book is that it is a are many more of such instances. catalogue of quotations from various sources, selec. Our author fails to recognize the importance of ted indiscriminately, without reference to the mat. Philology in the reconstruction of history and his want ter, whether it be spurious or otherwise. Evidently of acquaintance with it is clearly manifested by some he is labouring under the superstition that of his remarks. It has boon definitely proved once everything that appears in print is authoritative for all by Fortunatov, a French philologist, that the beyond dispute. In one place he remarks that Aryan cerebrals are the natural outcome of the Pånini mentions 64 grammarians and that Indra is coalescence of the dental and the lingual 1. Mr. one among them. As a matter of fact, neither does Aiyangar yet clings to the exploded theory of Pånini mention 64 grammarians, nor is Indra one Bishop Caldwell, who traces them to Dravidian in. of the grammarians mentioned by him. In certain fluences. Again, he holds the view that the un places the author acknowledges the sources of his cultured Vedic tongue ' resulted in the develop- information and in many places he does not. It is ment of classical Sanskrit, though scholars like hardly necessary to say more. It would be well it Grierson and others have proved that classica! Mr. Sesha Aiyangar could make sure of his facte Sanskrit had a collateral development with Vodie before launching into print-leaving aside his Sanskrit. It is surprising to note the confidence arguments. . with which he asserte the theory that the influence A Muhammadan woman's nose-omament of gold studded with gems. 1 The mehar is the dowry, which every bridegroom contracte to give his bride: generally of a value far beyond his moans. It is this dowry contract which binds the bridegroom to his bride. myd T. R. C.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370