Book Title: Sambodhi 2012 Vol 35 Author(s): J B Shah Publisher: L D Indology AhmedabadPage 45
________________ Vol. XXXV, 2012 The Earliest Portions of Daśavaikālika-sūtra 35 516), and plausibly Valabhi Synod I (c. mid 4th cent. A.D.) as well as the contemporaneous Mathurā Synod (c. A.D. 363) since hardly anything of the Gupta-Vākāaka-Maitraka period is noticeable anywhere inside the fabric of the text. Since the Yāpanīya sect of the Nirgranthas recognized and owed allegiance to the Ardhamāgadhi canon of the Northern Church, the quotations from this sūtra are found in the Yāpanīya pontiff Aparājita sūri's commentary (c. late 8th or early 9th cent. A.D.) on the Ārādhanā of the Yāpanīya pontiff Śivārya (c. 5th-6th cent. A.D.). The Sūtra, therefore, and doubtless, is fairly ancient. Incidentally, indeed interestingly, prior to the commentary on the Aradhanā, Aparājita sūri had written a commentary on the Daśavaikālika-sūtra itself, currently though unavailable. Since the Yāpaniya's parent sect, the Boika/Acela-Ksapanaka had branched off from the main stream of Northern Church some time early in the second century A.D.", it is clear that the Daśavaikālika had existed before the Kusāna period, though it may not then have had quite the same shape we today encounter, in spite of the relative all high antiquity of its language, verses as well as passages, and of course the content. Now, four verses from the Daśavaikālika's second chapter (2.710) are incorporated in the “Rathanemiya chapter of the Uttarādhyayana Sūtra (22.42-44, 46), the chapter being datable to c. 1st century A.D. So, the Daśavaikālika-sūtra arguably was known before the beginning of the Christian (or Common) Era. As will be shown, a greater part of Sayyambhava's text is lost (if it originally had contained ten chapters) and was substituted by chapters containing relatively earlier material that belonged to a few other cognate āgamic disciplinary works of the periods visibly posterior to Sayyambhava's time, but still fairly early, indeed composed as they mainly must have been some time before the Common Era. The following chapterwise survey of the work, though of necessity brief, can reveal the original portions of the text on the grounds of the general principles formulated in the foregoing discussion, with emphasis laid on the style and content. 1. Draumapușpīya The famous and oft-quoted opening verse beginning with the propitious phrase Dhammo mangala mukaham (or mukiham) of this first and very short chapter, which contains only five verses, undoubtedly is the most ancient in this work. A portion of the lower hemstitch of the first verse, devā vi tań namaṁsaṁti,' is imitated in the Rsibhāṣitāni" and also partiallyPage Navigation
1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224