Marathi - Latche marathi Aetihasik Lekh Part 02

Author(s): Vidyanand Swami Srivastava
Publisher: Aietihasik Gaurava Granthmala

Page 27

17
documentary evindences gives only three uncles of Raybhan Viz Dajibaba alias Udaji, Yogaraj and Kusalsingh. Of Course from amongst the three uncles we recognise, without any least fear of contradiction, Dajibaba ( Udaji) as the father of Arjansingh.
In the year 1817 Vikram Sravan Bad 5 (45 years latter, we find Kubereingh, Bhagawansingh and Ramsingh the three cons of Goolabsingh dividing their ancestoral property, including village Banjar given in Hadia Zagir to the descendent of Arjansingh Udaisingh. They also mention (ne Prabhatsingh as their sharer in property. When this division took place, we find cn the Gadi of Bansda Udaisir gh. Hense we find that in the line of Birdeva there are six persons rather steps including himself down to Udaisingh, and in the line of Dajeebaba there are seven steps including himself down to the three brothers. It is quite possible to be six steps in one line and seven in another and therefore, we without any least hesitation, declare this Table in question as unreliable.
TABLE. N O. II.
Table nos 1/b and 1c being harmless we pass over them and undertake the examination cf Table No. 2 submited by the Ranis of Hamirsinghji Udaisinghji. This Table names Adikaran the common oncestor instead of Udaisingh as shown in the Table refered to as Nos 1a. Besides it n akes Bhagawansinghji the eldest son of Goolabsingh, instead of Kubersingbji, and keeps Gomansingh continued in the line of his natural father, inspite of his adoption by Kubersinghji. There seems possibllities of some chance to adjust the diference between Udaisingh and Adikaran and we can allow these two names as aliases cf each other. But the change in the position of Kubersinghjee from eldest to youngest is deliberate and can not be justified even for a moment. We reserve our further comment in this matter for some latter stage and undertake Table No. 3.
TABLE No III.
This Table as a whole is got up, concocted and clumsy one. It seems to have been prepared having some alterior motive in sight and therefore from begining to end disorder and confussion are visible. It commences with one Ratansingh as the originator of the line and puts Udaisingh at the seventh steps downward. Of course it puts Arjansinghji as the fourth man. Onward it makes Raybhan, the son of Arjansing instead of Kiratsingh. We can admite