Marathi - Latche marathi Aetihasik Lekh Part 02

Author(s): Vidyanand Swami Srivastava
Publisher: Aietihasik Gaurava Granthmala

Page 33

23
of Bababhai, the second Dolat died issueless and Amar and Kesari had one son each Viz., Goolab and Gemalsingh.
Junior line.
C. In Bharoch the line of Prabhatsingh is continued in the persons of his three sons Jorawarsingh, Mansingh and Babaji. While in Boridra four sons are given to Prabhatsingh viz Jorawr, Man, Pratap and Bahadur. Ommision of Pratp's name is noteworthy;
D. In Bharoch Mansingh is given four sons. While in the Boridra he is given five sons. Baring this difference there is unanimity between them so far the names of four sons are concerned.
E. In Bharoch Goomansingh the eldest son of Mansingh is given two sons Amrababa and Kesarisingh. While the Boridra Table distinctly says that Goomansingh, the eldest son of Mansingh, went in adoption to Kubersingh of Senior Branch.
Before undertaking examination of another Tables we would like to say a few words. We place more reliance on the Boridra Table than on the Bharoch so far its statements are concerned from Udaisingh the second. Besides we hold that by omission of Pratapsingh, of Junior branch Bharoc,h Table is made rediculus to the core as according to the doccumentary evidences quoted above and others, his line is continued through adoption of Chandrasing the eldest son of Goomansingh of Senior line. And further on the line is coniuued by the adoption of Gemalsingh. and the surviving members of this line are his sons, Grand and Great Grand sons. They are at present known by the Name of Umargam Mota Basadias.
EXAMINATION OF TABLES 661
After our first visit at Umargam in Febuary 1884, we learnt that Bhagatia Bhagubaba has got some very old important documents and Geneological Tables. We were further told that he being very irresponsible Chatterer, it was next to impossible to prevail upon him to allow a glance over his valuavle treasure. In the end of the summer of 1936, with the help of Mr. Umedsingh Basadia, we manged to have a look over some of his papers and found two complete Tables. Besides these we found a piece of half burnt, paper which was a portion of a family tree. Any how we further managed to copy them, but totally failed to induce him to show the further portion of the burnt Geneology.