Book Title: Jainism in Buddhist Literature Author(s): Bhagchandra Jain Bhaskar Publisher: Alok PrakashanPage 46
________________ ( 27 ) the tradition of the Pali Capon has to be rejected. Both, Jacom bi and Charpentier were of the view that the statement in the Pali Canon to the effect that Mahavira died when the Buddha was at Pava was spurious. But this gives rise to a farther problem in view of the fact that the death of the Buddha is now widely accepted as having occured in 543 B. C. Therefore this quistion needs further investigation as the interval between the death of Buddha and Mahāvira could not have been as long as 75 years. Basham, too, is inclined to accept Jacobi's view. But he based his arguments on the Bhagavati Satra and a less favoured theory about the date of the Buddh's Parinirvana in 483 B. C. He says ; "If we accept 483 B. C. as the date of the Buddha's nirvāna, on the basis of Mahāvamsa synchronism, the accession of Ajātasattu must have occured in the year 481.480 B. C. The first campaign, soon after which the death of Gosāla occurred, must have taken place at some time between the date of Ajātasattu's accession and the year preceding the Buddha's death." He then suggests that "the first campaign occured in 484B, C,, and the death of Gosāla in that year, or in 484 B. C. On the strength of the Bhagvati statement that Mahāvīra survived Gosala for sixteen and a half years, this date would place Mahāvíra's death in 468-467 B. C59." As regards the reference to the Nigantha Nataputta in Pāli scripture he suggests that “the Pāli record may not in fact refer to the death of Mahavira at Pavā, but to that of Gosāla at Savatthi, which Bhagvati Sūtra also mentions as having been accompained by quarrelling and confusion. At a later date, when the chief rival of Buddhism was no longer Ajivikism but Jainism, the name may have been altered to add to the signifi cance of the account6o. The explanation of Basham tbat the Pali Canon recorded the death of Gosäla and not that of Mābavira appears to be farfetched. Majumdar and Raychaudhuri are of the view that Mahā. vira's death should have taken place in 478 B. C. In support of this theory they suggest that Mahavira died about sixteenPage Navigation
1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326